2020
DOI: 10.5248/135.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and molecular identification of Phlebia wuliangshanensis sp. nov. in China

Abstract: A new white-rot fungus, Phlebia wuliangshanensis, is proposed based on a combination of morphological features and molecular evidence. The species is characterized by an annual growth habit, resupinate basidiocarps with a smooth to tuberculate hymenial surface, a monomitic hyphal system with thin- to thick-walled generative hyphae bearing simple septa, presence of cystidia, and narrow ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores (5–6 × 3–3.7 μm). Our phylogenetic analyses of ITS and LSU nrRNA sequences performed with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across all species of Phlebia s.l., the smooth, tuberculata, phlebioid, merulioid, odontioid–hydnoid, and poroid hymenophores are varied, such as the phlebioid species ( Phlebia radiata ), merulioid species ( Merulius tremellosus ), hydnoid species ( Mycoacia fuscoatra ), poroid species ( Ceriporiopsoides guidella ), smooth species ( Luteochaete subglobosa ), and the tuberculate species ( Phlebicolorata brevispora ). Traditionally, the hymenophore configurations of morphological study for this group play a core role, but the macromorphology of fruiting bodies and hymenophore construction did not reflect monophyletic features for this group in the present study ( Figure 1 ), which is generally consistent with previous phylogenetic studies [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 38 , 43 , 44 ]. The evolution mechanism for morphology and phylogeny is still confusing mycologists.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Across all species of Phlebia s.l., the smooth, tuberculata, phlebioid, merulioid, odontioid–hydnoid, and poroid hymenophores are varied, such as the phlebioid species ( Phlebia radiata ), merulioid species ( Merulius tremellosus ), hydnoid species ( Mycoacia fuscoatra ), poroid species ( Ceriporiopsoides guidella ), smooth species ( Luteochaete subglobosa ), and the tuberculate species ( Phlebicolorata brevispora ). Traditionally, the hymenophore configurations of morphological study for this group play a core role, but the macromorphology of fruiting bodies and hymenophore construction did not reflect monophyletic features for this group in the present study ( Figure 1 ), which is generally consistent with previous phylogenetic studies [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 38 , 43 , 44 ]. The evolution mechanism for morphology and phylogeny is still confusing mycologists.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…is provided by employing seven gene phylogenetic analyses at the intergeneric level ( Figure 1 ), which discusses the circumscription and phylogenetic relationships of genera in Phlebia s.l. The tree topologies are generally consistent with previous phylogenetic studies using ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) alone or in combination with the protein-coding genes [ 28 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 38 ]. However, some minor differences still exist due to the different scales of sampling and lower supports for several topologies in this group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations