2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and nanostructural surface changes in Escherichia coli over time, monitored by atomic force microscopy

Abstract: The present study aims at evaluating intrinsic changes in Escherichia coli (E. coli) surface over time, by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). For that purpose, bacteria were immobilized on mica or on mica previously functionalized by the deposition of a polyelectrolyte multilayer cushion. AFM images reveal that E. coli population goes through different stages. Firstly, after a week, the number of healthy bacteria decreases resulting in a release of cellular components which likely become, in turn, a nutrition sour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our single cell analyses using fluorescence microscopy revealed a high heterogeneity between single cells with R-LPS labeling ranging from absence to patchy and even full labeling (Figs 1A and EV1). Furthermore, in AFM analyses, the areas enriched in R-LPS correlated with a high roughness (R a ) value (Fig 2), suggesting that irregular surface structures, already reported for E. coli (Amro et al, 2000;Gammoudi et al, 2016) and S. meliloti (Greif et al, 2010), correspond to mixes of long and short LPS molecules. To our knowledge, this is the first study making a correlation between the presence of R-LPS clusters localized by fluorescence microscopy and the physical surface structure of the bacterial surface investigated by AFM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Our single cell analyses using fluorescence microscopy revealed a high heterogeneity between single cells with R-LPS labeling ranging from absence to patchy and even full labeling (Figs 1A and EV1). Furthermore, in AFM analyses, the areas enriched in R-LPS correlated with a high roughness (R a ) value (Fig 2), suggesting that irregular surface structures, already reported for E. coli (Amro et al, 2000;Gammoudi et al, 2016) and S. meliloti (Greif et al, 2010), correspond to mixes of long and short LPS molecules. To our knowledge, this is the first study making a correlation between the presence of R-LPS clusters localized by fluorescence microscopy and the physical surface structure of the bacterial surface investigated by AFM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Firstly, it emphasized the particular ultrastruc ture present on healthy E.coli's surface. This "brain like" organization, here called ripples, is attributed to the conformation of LPS molecules in the OM [56]. Then, AFM observations confirmed, at the cellular level, the existence of a NPs size threshold, 50 nm < Φ c < 80 nm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Such invaginations were reported in antibiotic (penicillin and amoxicillin) treatment of E. coli, interfering with enzymes involved in the peptidoglycan synthesis [58]. In addition, SiO 2 NPs − smaller than Φ c induce a reorganization in E. coli's OM structure from a ripples pattern to more compact and rounded aggregates, typical of weakened bacteria [56]. This transition might arise from (i) the spatial reorganization of the LPS molecules from a ripples structure to an aggregated one or (ii) from the transition in their molecular conformation from an extended to a more condensed one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A commonly used biological assay, for example, tests the antimicrobial effect of NPs by evaluating the bacterial viability after exposure to NPs. 15,16 Physical aspects of NP− bacteria interactions tend to be analyzed by high-resolution imaging techniques, such as electron, 8,9,11,12,14 atomic force, 17 or Raman 13 microscopies, which can provide direct and quantitative information about NPs and cells (such as proximity, penetration, aggregation) but typically not directly in solution environments where NPs and bacteria interact. Artifacts introduced during preparation for imaging, therefore, can obscure evidence of NP−bacteria interactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%