1974
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183x001400030026x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and Physiological Traits in Maize Associated with Tolerance to High Plant Density1

Abstract: Maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids were grown at a high plant density (98,800 plants/ha) to determine the influence of several morphological and physiological traits on barrenness, the major factor limiting grain yields at high stand densities. Correlation and multiple regression analyses indicated density‐tolerant maize genotypes would be characterized by rapid completion of silk extrusion, coincidence of pollen‐shed and silk extrusion, rapid growth of the fust ear and first‐ear silk, prolificacy, reduced tassel siz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

11
67
1
3

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier study by Stivers et al (1971) demonstrated that there were more barren ears, contributing to lower yield, in wider rows (102, 76 cm) than in narrow rows (0.51 m) under drought stress conditions. However, some studies have shown no yield advantage for narrow rows (Giesbrecht 1969;Nunez and Kamprath 1969;Alessi andPower 1974, 1975) and, in some cases, high plant densities have been found to reduce kernel number per unit land area (Andrade et al 1993), decrease the number of kernels per ear (Ireminen and Milbourn 1980;Tetio-Kagho and Gardner 1988), decrease harvest index (Tollenaar 1991), and reduce the overall grain yield (Buren et al 1974;Daynard and Muldoon 1983). These reductions in grain yield have mainly been attributed to an increase in ear barrenness (Buren et al 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An earlier study by Stivers et al (1971) demonstrated that there were more barren ears, contributing to lower yield, in wider rows (102, 76 cm) than in narrow rows (0.51 m) under drought stress conditions. However, some studies have shown no yield advantage for narrow rows (Giesbrecht 1969;Nunez and Kamprath 1969;Alessi andPower 1974, 1975) and, in some cases, high plant densities have been found to reduce kernel number per unit land area (Andrade et al 1993), decrease the number of kernels per ear (Ireminen and Milbourn 1980;Tetio-Kagho and Gardner 1988), decrease harvest index (Tollenaar 1991), and reduce the overall grain yield (Buren et al 1974;Daynard and Muldoon 1983). These reductions in grain yield have mainly been attributed to an increase in ear barrenness (Buren et al 1974).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrenness often is used as a criterion for classifying genotypes as either density tolerant or intolerant because high negative correlations between grain yield and barrenness at high plant densities have been well documented in the literature (Lang et al, 1956;Stinson and Moss, I96O; Pendleton and Seîf, I96I; Woolley et al, 1962;Stickler, 1964;Timmons et al, 1966;Rutger and Crowder, 1967;Buren, 1970). In three experiments reported'by Buren et al in 1974, correlation coefficients between grain yield and barrenness at 98,800 plants/ha ranged from -0.76 to -O.89. Stinson and Moss (I960) suggested that competition for light is a principal cause of the inability of maize hybrids to tolerate dense plantings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Additionally, Kohnke and Miles (1951) reported that silking was delayed approximately one day for every increase of 7,000 -8,000 plants/ha. Maize hybrids intolerant of high plant densities have a longer delay in silk emergence than those that are tolerant (Moss and Stinson, 1961;Schwanke, 1965;Earley et al, 1967;Meyer, 1970;Buren, 1970;El-Lakany and Russell, 1971;Mock and Buren, 1972;Buren et al, (1974);Fakorede, 1977).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations