2012
DOI: 10.5402/2012/326461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and Pomological Diversity of Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars in Northwest of Tunisia

Abstract: The comprehensive analyses of all the data permitted to distinguish some particular genotypes as distinct cultivars, and groups of cultivars as polyclone varieties. It was possible to discriminate six distinct cultivars and two groups of multiclone varieties (Soltani and Thgagli) with different degrees of polymorphism. Hypotheses of homonymy and synonymy were suggested for some cultivars. The diversity is currently threatened by genetic erosion. Measure of conservation is necessary to be undertaken.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
20
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
11
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, minimum fruit weight was noted in CZBGV 20 (114 g). Similar kind of results were reported by Chatti et al, (2008) and Gaaliche et al, (2012) in fig collection and by Mratinić et al, (2011) in Apricot.…”
Section: Range Of Variationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, minimum fruit weight was noted in CZBGV 20 (114 g). Similar kind of results were reported by Chatti et al, (2008) and Gaaliche et al, (2012) in fig collection and by Mratinić et al, (2011) in Apricot.…”
Section: Range Of Variationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Many others are unnamed but regularly used by farmers. Differences were noted for fruit characteristics and date of pollen maturity [7,10]. Fig pollinator, because of ecological conditions, might be scarce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L'analyse des résultats (Tableau 3) montre que les caractères qualitatifs des figues permettent de caractériser individuellement la moitié des espèces étudiées. Il s'agit de F. conraui, F. cordata, F. ingens, F. lutea, F. ottoniifolia, F. ovata, F. polita, F. sur, F. sycomorus, F. thonningii, F. umbellata et F. vallis-choudae. Ces caractères qualitatifs ont une importance taxonomique réelle car ils sont fréquents et stables chez l'espèce (Zhekun and Gilbert, 2003 ;Kumar et al, 2011 ;Gaaliche, 2012).…”
Section: Morphologie De L'appareil Reproducteur Caractères Qualitatifunclassified
“…Les caractères quantitatifs des figues sont souvent utilisés pour identifier les différentes espèces du genre Ficus et leur importance taxonomique a été attestée par plusieurs auteurs (Zhekun et Gilbert. 2003 ;Sonibare et al, 2004 ;Polat et Caliskan, 2008 ;Gaaliche et al, 2012 ;Lansky et Paavilainen, 2017 La forme caractéristique des figues (réceptacles urcéolés) a permis : -de distinguer le genre Ficus des autres genres de la famille des Moraceae ; -d'apporter plus de précision dans la taxonomie des espèces du genre Ficus L.…”
Section: Caractères Quantitatifs Des Figuesunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation