2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30648-9_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological and Temporal ECG Features for Myocardial Infarction Detection Using Support Vector Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tree-based ML algorithmic models report high accuracy like 97.88% for Random Forest (RF), 98.23% for Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and 98.03% for Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and outperform other ML algorithms, and their performance is comparable to the highend DL architectures [2]. Apart from tree-based algorithms, other ML algorithms like Support Vector Machine (SVM) give better accuracy like 96.67% with morphological & temporal features [17], 98.33% with 220 features [18] & 100% [19], along with grasshopper optimization algorithm, 99.9% for cubic models & 99.8% for a quadratic model [20], 95.1% for Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) [17] algorithm, and 94.9% for Logistic Regression [21].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree-based ML algorithmic models report high accuracy like 97.88% for Random Forest (RF), 98.23% for Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and 98.03% for Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and outperform other ML algorithms, and their performance is comparable to the highend DL architectures [2]. Apart from tree-based algorithms, other ML algorithms like Support Vector Machine (SVM) give better accuracy like 96.67% with morphological & temporal features [17], 98.33% with 220 features [18] & 100% [19], along with grasshopper optimization algorithm, 99.9% for cubic models & 99.8% for a quadratic model [20], 95.1% for Adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) [17] algorithm, and 94.9% for Logistic Regression [21].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent research on ECG classification computer-aid systems is based on new techniques of artificial intelligence. Various types of these techniques have been investigated and analyzed for this purpose and other purposes [ 22 , 23 ], such as decision trees [ 24 ], random forest (RF) [ 25 , 26 , 27 ], support vector machine (SVM) [ 28 , 29 ], k-nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 30 ], the hybrid FFPSONeural network classifier [ 31 ], in addition to other methods, such as [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. In [ 35 ], the authors incorporated two categories, normal and MI, into their investigation.…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%