2019
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological awareness predicts the growth rate of Chinese character reading

Abstract: In this longitudinal study, we assessed 88 Hong Kong Chinese typically developing kindergarteners' Chinese character reading accuracy four times with 6-month intervals over 1.5 years with the first testing point in the fall of the second year of kindergarten (K2), during which morphological awareness, phonological awareness, orthographic awareness, visual-spatial relationships, and nonverbal IQ were tested (Time 1). The latent growth curve modeling showed that reading development in Chinese of typically develo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with previous studies of Chinese word reading (So & Siegel, 1997; Wang et al, 2015; Wei et al, 2014), the finding further lends support to the universal account of word reading—that the word reading process involves universal aspects of language including semantics, orthography, and phonology (Frost, 2012). However, we did not find the unique role of MA in word reading that has been demonstrated in many previous studies (Lin et al, 2019; McBride-Chang et al, 2003). This may be because MA taps into the awareness of syntactic rules within Chinese words and hence is more involved in text and compound word reading (Wang & McBride-Chang, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Together with previous studies of Chinese word reading (So & Siegel, 1997; Wang et al, 2015; Wei et al, 2014), the finding further lends support to the universal account of word reading—that the word reading process involves universal aspects of language including semantics, orthography, and phonology (Frost, 2012). However, we did not find the unique role of MA in word reading that has been demonstrated in many previous studies (Lin et al, 2019; McBride-Chang et al, 2003). This may be because MA taps into the awareness of syntactic rules within Chinese words and hence is more involved in text and compound word reading (Wang & McBride-Chang, 2016).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Other likely casualties of the century‐long Anglophone obsession with (oral) word‐reading accuracy include the study of meaning (i.e., morphology, morphological awareness), which has only begun receiving the research attention it deserves over the past decade or so (e.g., Berthiaume, Daigle, & Desrochers, 2018; Bowers & Bowers, 2017; Duncan, 2018; Goodwin & Ahn, 2013; Harm & Seidenberg, 2004; Ke, Miller, Zhang, & Koda, 2021; Kirby & Bowers, 2017; Kuo & Anderson, 2006; Levesque, Breadmore, & Deacon, 2021; Lin, Sun, & McBride, 2019; Rastle, 2018; Verhoeven & Perfetti, 2011). Oral reading accuracy, furthermore, also emphasizes phonological processes more so than silent (word) reading at the expense of orthography and morphology (for a discussion, see Share, 2008).…”
Section: Anglocentrism In the Science Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chinese, over 90% of words are lexical compounds, such as snow+man. Greater Chinese compound awareness in kindergarten is associated with better single word/character reading, and steeper growth trajectories in reading over time (Lin et al, 2019). In contrast to Chinese, Spanish predominantly uses derivational affixes to create multimorphemic words such as person+al+ity (personalidad).…”
Section: Study 2: Bilingual Transfer Effects On Morphological Awareness and English Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%