2015
DOI: 10.5958/2231-1750.2015.00020.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Characterisation of Tomato Wild Relatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were also a large number of light-responsive CREs in the SRO promoter region, mainly BOX-4 and G-BOX, and most light-responsive elements were significantly enriched in S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme and S. pimpinellifolium , which was consistent with their light-loving and heat-resistant growth characteristics ( Kumar et al, 2015 ). Stress-related response elements showed that many SRO genes were induced by an anaerobic response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…There were also a large number of light-responsive CREs in the SRO promoter region, mainly BOX-4 and G-BOX, and most light-responsive elements were significantly enriched in S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme and S. pimpinellifolium , which was consistent with their light-loving and heat-resistant growth characteristics ( Kumar et al, 2015 ). Stress-related response elements showed that many SRO genes were induced by an anaerobic response.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%