2007
DOI: 10.5352/jls.2007.17.3.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological characteristics and genetic diversity of Calanthe species native to Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, morphological characteristics and RAPD markers have been used to reveal genetic diversity of Korean Calanthe (Cho et al, 2010). Thus, combination of phenotypes and molecular markers could be a useful tool for plant genetic diversity.…”
Section: Morphological Diversity Of Korean P Australismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, morphological characteristics and RAPD markers have been used to reveal genetic diversity of Korean Calanthe (Cho et al, 2010). Thus, combination of phenotypes and molecular markers could be a useful tool for plant genetic diversity.…”
Section: Morphological Diversity Of Korean P Australismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tepals of C. sieboldii are yellow, that of C. discolor reddish purple with white lip, and that of C. bicolor intermediate between the two species. The length of the spur of C. bicolor is also intermediate between that of C. sieboldii and C. discolor (Cho et al 2007). There have also been some studies on the genetic relationships among Calanthe species (Hyun et al 1999, Cho et al 2007, Kim et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The length of the spur of C. bicolor is also intermediate between that of C. sieboldii and C. discolor (Cho et al 2007). There have also been some studies on the genetic relationships among Calanthe species (Hyun et al 1999, Cho et al 2007, Kim et al 2009). However, they dealt with a limited number of taxa within the genus in Korea as well as used only single‐marker techniques, meaning that these results were not comprehensive to determine the genetic relationships among the species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For virus detection, various diagnostic methods have been developed, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (Vejaratpimol et al, 1998), polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Lim et al, 1993), reverse transcription (RT)-PCR (Seoh et al, 1998), realtime PCR (Eun et al, 2000), and RT loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays . Nevertheless, the virus has been studied with respect to its genetic diversity, homogeneity, relationships, distribution, phenotype, morphological characteristics, and taxonomy in Korea (Cho et al, 2007;Chung et al, 2014;Hyun et al, 1999;Kim et al, 2013;Lee et al, 2008;Srikanth et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%