2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological classification of brains via high-dimensional shape transformations and machine learning methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
225
0
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
225
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Euclidean wavelet approaches have been used to classify structural brain data (Canales-Rodriguez et al, 2013;Lao et al, 2004) as a means to assess structural morphometric differences between different populations of subjects. They have also been used to discriminate between healthy and pathological tissue by characterizing subtle changes in brain structure in a variety of diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and multiple sclerosis (Hackmack et al, 2012;Harrison et al, 2010).…”
Section: Extension To Structural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Euclidean wavelet approaches have been used to classify structural brain data (Canales-Rodriguez et al, 2013;Lao et al, 2004) as a means to assess structural morphometric differences between different populations of subjects. They have also been used to discriminate between healthy and pathological tissue by characterizing subtle changes in brain structure in a variety of diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment and multiple sclerosis (Hackmack et al, 2012;Harrison et al, 2010).…”
Section: Extension To Structural Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For participants who developed dementia over the course of the study, the most recent MRI prior to the diagnosis was used, with a mean (SD) interval of 1.9 (1.9) years between most recent scan and diagnosis. Volumetric measurements from these brain regions were then used to build a classifier [35,47], which produced an abnormality score: positive values indicate a structural pattern resembling MCI, whereas negative values indicate brain structure in unimpaired individuals. A value of 0 would indicate a structural profile that is in-between normal and abnormal.…”
Section: Pattern Analysis and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However differential diagnosis between FTD and AD based on structural, rather than functional, scans is a greater challenge. The development of sophisticated high-dimensional image analysis and classification methods in the field of computational neuroanatomy during the past decade can potentially help overcome this challenge (Golland 2002;Lao, Shen et al 2004;Csernansky, Wang et al 2005;Davatzikos, Ruparel et al 2005;Davatzikos, Fan et al 2006, epub;Fan, Batmanghelich et al 2008;Lerch, Pruessner et al 2008;Vemuri, Gunter et al 2008). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%