2018
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2018.1447393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological computation in haptic sensation and interaction: from nature to robotics

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
(164 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In nature, many living organisms can autonomously respond to mechanical stimulation without nervous control . This intelligent behavior can be found in the plant kingdom, such as the autonomous folding of the Venus flytrap and mimosa pudica when touched.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nature, many living organisms can autonomously respond to mechanical stimulation without nervous control . This intelligent behavior can be found in the plant kingdom, such as the autonomous folding of the Venus flytrap and mimosa pudica when touched.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the relationship between sensor morphology and action for perception has been explored ( Huang et al, 2019 ; Scimeca et al, 2020b ; Scimeca et al, 2021 ). These approaches highlight the importance of sensor structure and morphology when performing action based perception tasks ( Bernth et al, 2018 ). This research direction highlights some of the trade-offs that existing in optimizing sensor morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many skin-inspired wearable or implantable sensors have been developed for motion detection and health monitoring, they are generally made of rigid and brittle electronic materials without high enough stretchability, resulting in fundamental mismatch and uncomfortable in mechanics with human bodies. [2][3][4][5] Human skin not only has powerful sensory organs but also is soft and stretchable to adapt the body motions. Development of soft and stretchable sensors is of significance in the realm of wearable sensing skins and has the advantages of higher flexibility, better adaptability, and conformal integration over their rigid counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%