2020
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2020.2975454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Detection and Extraction of Rail Surface Defects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The RSDD dataset has been extensively applied in the literature [ 15 , 17 , 36 , 38 , 42 , 43 ], and thereby, our defect detection approach can be properly compared with previous ones to evaluate the performance. The same evaluation criteria, namely the precision (Pre), recall (Rec), and F-measure (F), were adopted at both the pixel and defect levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The RSDD dataset has been extensively applied in the literature [ 15 , 17 , 36 , 38 , 42 , 43 ], and thereby, our defect detection approach can be properly compared with previous ones to evaluate the performance. The same evaluation criteria, namely the precision (Pre), recall (Rec), and F-measure (F), were adopted at both the pixel and defect levels.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The publicly available data resource namely the rail surface discrete defects (RSDD) dataset [ 36 ], which has been extensively applied in evaluating different approaches for railhead defect detection (e.g., [ 17 , 37 , 38 ]), constituted the data foundation of this research. It comprises two types of track surface images: the Type-I RSDD dataset contained 67 challenging images acquired from express tracks, and the Type-II RSDD dataset contained 128 challenging images acquired from ordinary/heavy haul tracks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNNs have also been utilised to perform railcar safety inspection [154], determine the area of the rails ahead [155] detecting objects ahead [156], detect multiple catenary systems and support components [157]- [159], tracking joints [160] and detecting track defects [161], [162].…”
Section: Related Work In Railway Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, many scholars have conducted research on the detection methods of rail surface defects. ese methods mainly solve three problems, namely, the classification of rail surface defects [28,29], location of rail surface defects [30][31][32][33], and pixel-level segmentation of rail surface defects [34][35][36][37]. Among them, the pixel-level segmentation of rail surface defects is a key research problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the pixel-level segmentation of rail surface defects is a key research problem. Nieniewski [34] proposed a detection method based on morphological processing for pixel-level extraction of rail surface defects. e main advantage of this method is the fast detection speed that can reach 50 ms/ frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%