1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record 1996
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.1996.587977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological filtering and stochastic modeling-based segmentation of masses on mammographic images

Abstract: The objective of this study is to develop an efficient method to highlight the geometric characteristics of mass patterns, and isolate the suspicious regions which in turn provide the improved segmentation of suspected masses. In this work, a combined method of using morphological operations, finite generalized Gaussian mixture modeling, and contextual Bayesian relaxation labeling was developed to enhance and segment various mammographic contexts and textures. This method was applied to segment suspicious mass… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first one, the maximum likelihood quantification scheme, tissue types are first quantified using maximum likelihood principle, where only soft classification of the pixel images is required [1]. Further classification of a sample is then performed by placing it into the class for which the posterior probability or the support function is maximum, i.e., by Bayesian consistent labeling [45], [46]. The quantities obtained by sample averages after imperfect pixel classification may not be consistent with the previous quantification result [23].…”
Section: Theory and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the first one, the maximum likelihood quantification scheme, tissue types are first quantified using maximum likelihood principle, where only soft classification of the pixel images is required [1]. Further classification of a sample is then performed by placing it into the class for which the posterior probability or the support function is maximum, i.e., by Bayesian consistent labeling [45], [46]. The quantities obtained by sample averages after imperfect pixel classification may not be consistent with the previous quantification result [23].…”
Section: Theory and Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It operates on an initial segmented image, preferably one with uniformly distributed classification errors, such as the one segmented by the classification-maximization (CM) algorithm [29]. PCRN uses stochastic discrete gradient descent procedure where each pixel is randomly visited and its label is updated [16], [45], i.e., pixel i is classified into the kth region if…”
Section: Probabilistic Constraint Relaxation Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%