2016
DOI: 10.1080/00393274.2016.1150788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Relatedness and the Typology of Adjectival Formations in Old English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there has been much philological and lexicographical discussion on the morphological development of OE, there have not been parallel advances in the computational study of the language. Apart from the digitized versions of the Dictionary of Old English Corpus -henceforth DOEC- (Healey et al, 2004) and The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose -hereafter YCOE- (Taylor et al, 2003); the online versions of the Dictionary of Old English -henceforth DOE- (Healey et al, 2018) and of An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (Tichy & Rocek, 2019); and the series of studies (Mateo Mendaza, 2016;Novo Urraca, 2016;Martín Arista & Ojanguren López, 2018;Vea Escarza, 2018;or Vázquez González & Barðdal, 2019) based on the knowledge base The Grid (Martín Arista, 2013), not many advances have been made in computer-based studies of OE, at a time when Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches are becoming central to linguistic analysis.…”
Section: Aims Relevance and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there has been much philological and lexicographical discussion on the morphological development of OE, there have not been parallel advances in the computational study of the language. Apart from the digitized versions of the Dictionary of Old English Corpus -henceforth DOEC- (Healey et al, 2004) and The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose -hereafter YCOE- (Taylor et al, 2003); the online versions of the Dictionary of Old English -henceforth DOE- (Healey et al, 2018) and of An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary (Tichy & Rocek, 2019); and the series of studies (Mateo Mendaza, 2016;Novo Urraca, 2016;Martín Arista & Ojanguren López, 2018;Vea Escarza, 2018;or Vázquez González & Barðdal, 2019) based on the knowledge base The Grid (Martín Arista, 2013), not many advances have been made in computer-based studies of OE, at a time when Natural Language Processing (NLP) approaches are becoming central to linguistic analysis.…”
Section: Aims Relevance and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the compilation of the initial inventory of lemmas of strong verbs and the design of a lemmatisation method, this article aims at maximising the automatic search for the inflectional forms of the verbs under analysis, with the corresponding minimisation of manual revision. With these aims, this article contributes to the research line in the linguistic analysis of Old English pursued, among others, by García García ), Martín Arista (2012a, 2012b, fc-a, fc-b), Mateo Mendaza (2013, 2015a, 2015b, 2016), Novo Urraca (2015, 2016a, 2016b) and Vea Escarza (2012, 2016. The relevance of the undertaking lies in the lack of a lemmatised corpus of Old English.…”
Section: Aims and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, the data combine synchronic and diachronic facts (the outcome of word-formation processes remain for a long time in the lexicon even though the word-formation that created them is no longer operative). The study of Old English morphology and semantics carried out by Kastovsky (1992b) has been continued in four directions: morphological analysis (García García 2019); the semantic analysis of semantic primes , 2016; the analysis of lexical functions (Vea Escarza 2016; and paradigmatic morphology (Martín Arista 2013, 2017Novo Urraca 2015, 2016a, 2016b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%