Morphological signatures of normal faulting in low‐gradient alluvial rivers in south‐eastern Louisiana, USA

Abstract

We explore the fluvial response to faulting in three low‐gradient, sand‐bed rivers in south‐eastern Louisiana, USA, that flow across active normal faults from footwall (upstream) to hangingwall (downstream). We calculate sinuosity, migration rate and migration direction in order to identify anomalies spatially associated with fault scarps. In two of the rivers we model one‐dimensional steady water flow to identify anomalies in surface water slope, width‐to‐depth ratio, and shear stress. In each of these rivers there is one location where flow modeling suggests potential channel incision through the footwall, as indicated by relatively high surface water slopes and shear stress values. In one of these footwall locations, the river straightens and width‐to‐depth ratios decrease, likely contributing to higher surface water slopes and shear stress. This is in contrast to previous studies that have proposed increased sinuosity across fault footwalls and decreased sinuosity across hangingwalls. However, in two hangingwall locations we also observe relatively less sinuous channels. Other planform changes on the hangingwall include topographic steering of channels along and towards the fault and one example of an avulsion. The most notable anomaly in migration rate occurs on the hangingwall of a fault where a river has cut off a meander loop. Although fluvial response to faulting varies here, comparatively large and small channels exhibit similar responses. Further, Pleistocene fault slip rates are orders of magnitude lower than the channel migration rates, suggesting that faulting should not be a major influence on the fluvial evolution. Nonetheless, notable channel anomalies exist near faults, suggesting that recent fault slip rates are higher than Pleistocene rates, and/or that low‐gradient alluvial channels are more sensitive to faulting than previous studies have suggested. Rivers appear to be influenced by faulting in this setting, however background rates of meander loop cutoff may be just as influential as faulting. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Coastal Subsidence Due to Faults: Insights from Elevation Profiles of Vehicular Bridges, Southeastern Louisiana, U.S.A.

“…Dokka, 2006;Gagliano et al, 2003). Most contemporary work on coastal Louisiana faults has tended to focus on understanding geological (10s-100s ky) slip rates and the impact that faults have on both long-term (thousands to millions of years) subsidence and landscape evolution (Armstrong et al, 2013;Fredrick et al, 2019;Gasparini et al, 2015;Shen et al 2017;Yeager et al, 2012). Although some studies have documented the deformation of human structures in the vicinity of known faults (e.g., Lopez, Penland, and Williams, 1997;McCulloh, 2001), overall, very little information exists on how faults contribute to subsidence over historical timescales in terms of both rates and subsidence patterns.…”

Mechanisms of late Quaternary fault throw‐rate variability along the north central Gulf of Mexico coast: implications for coastal subsidence

“…Coleman & Roberts, ). Second, there is a well‐mapped major fault system in this area that has known late Quaternary activity (Fisk, ; McCulloh & Heinrich, ; Gasparini et al ., ). Third, OSL dating has a proven potential here to date sediments that record fault motion (Rittenour et al ., ; Shen et al ., ).…”

When does faulting-induced subsidence drive distributary network reorganization?

“…In an opposite feedback, tectonic subsidence in deltaic environments commonly includes movement along fault planes, caused by gravitational instability from accumulating sediment (e.g., salt tectonics, slumps, growth faults; . In turn, accumulated growth fault displacement may affect channel orientation and location Gasparini, Fischer, Adams, Dawers, & Janoff, 2016).…”

“…These aforementioned patterns constitute time-integrated system behavior and do not predict channel evolution and sediment dispersal at timescales pertinent to coastal restoration (10 2 yr). Indeed, channels ordinarily locate irrespective of time-integrated subsidence patterns (Hickson, Sheets, Paola, & Kelberer, 2005;Kim et al, 2010;Straub & Esposito, 2013;Gasparini et al, 2016;. Significant vertical fault displacement 10 0 -10 1 m over less than one year has been observed , but fault activity varies in space and time (Mouslopoulou, Walsh, & Nicol, 2009;Fossen, 2020).…”