1997
DOI: 10.1515/thli.1997.23.3.201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological Structure and the Processing of Inflected Words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
68
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
68
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present research adds into a long series of studies, which show that behavioral data of healthy adults and of brain-damaged patients can dissociate the language faculty into two components. First, our results suggest that lexical mechanisms apply to monomorphemic representations such as irregular forms and roots, whereas combinatorial rules apply to complex words such as regular or subregular forms (see also Clahsen et al, 1997;Schreuder & Baayen, 1995;Taft, 1979). Second, we showed that both language components can be dissociated in striatal-damaged patients.…”
Section: Novel Elements For Language Modelsmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present research adds into a long series of studies, which show that behavioral data of healthy adults and of brain-damaged patients can dissociate the language faculty into two components. First, our results suggest that lexical mechanisms apply to monomorphemic representations such as irregular forms and roots, whereas combinatorial rules apply to complex words such as regular or subregular forms (see also Clahsen et al, 1997;Schreuder & Baayen, 1995;Taft, 1979). Second, we showed that both language components can be dissociated in striatal-damaged patients.…”
Section: Novel Elements For Language Modelsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…One such manipulation is the word frequency effect by which rule-defined decomposition of suffixed words has been related to automatic processing within the language module (see e.g., Taft, 1979). Clahsen, Eisenbeiss, and Sonnenstuhl (1997), using a lexical decision task (word vs. nonword decision), have shown that reaction times (RTs) with irregular verbs depend on form frequency, reflecting that conjugated forms of irregulars are accessed in the mental lexicon, whereas RT with regulars do not. Conversely, it has been shown that RTs with regular verb forms depend on the frequency of their root, reflecting that roots of regulars (and not conjugated forms) are accessed in the mental lexicon and that morphemic decomposition is primarily involved (Bertram et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third approach is offered by the so-called Dual Mechanism model (e.g., Pinker & Prince, 1994;Clahsen et al, 1997;Clahsen, 1999;Sonnenstuhl et al, 1999). Here, the linguistic distinction between irregular and default inflection is claimed to determine how complex word forms are represented and processed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that speakers of English activate a computational mechanism to process regular forms (by concatenating a base to a suffix: walk + ed in language production or decomposing the items into their morphological constituents in language comprehension), but rely on memory to process irregular forms. Research on languages other than English has shown a similar pattern (BOWDEN, 2007;MORGAN-SHORT et al, 2010;EISENBEISS;SONNENSTUHL, 1997). Other findings, however, contradict such claims.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%