2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological variability within and among three species of Ziziphus genus using multivariate analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, brix values show negative correlation with hue angle. These findings are consistent with the previous results in which a strong positive correlation coefficient was also obtained between those traits in three species of Ziziphus genus ( Ziziphus nummularia , Ziziphus spina-christi and Ziziphus oxyphylla ) ( Norouzi et al . 2017 ), sour cherry ( Prunus cerasus ) ( Ganopoulos et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, brix values show negative correlation with hue angle. These findings are consistent with the previous results in which a strong positive correlation coefficient was also obtained between those traits in three species of Ziziphus genus ( Ziziphus nummularia , Ziziphus spina-christi and Ziziphus oxyphylla ) ( Norouzi et al . 2017 ), sour cherry ( Prunus cerasus ) ( Ganopoulos et al .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The hue angle varied from 68.09° to 81.09° as indicated in Table 2 . Any morphological trait showing CVs greater than 20.00% indicates a high variability between the genotypes ( Norouzi et al . 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L* and chroma values may reflect different concentrations of pigments as both parameters could be correlated with the total pigment of fruit mesocarp (Itle and Kabelka, 2009). Among the five color space values, a* presents the highest CVs especially for accessions from Simpang Empat (30.27%) which is greater than 20.00%, indicated a high variability (Norouzi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This variation may depend on the cultivar and ecological conditions (Gao et al 2011). Also, height differentiation among genotypes is caused by factors such as breeding system, isolation of population, seed and pollen dispersal distance (Norouzia et al 2017). Exhibiting significant variability could be attributed to fact that the genotypes grow over a wide range of rainfall, temperature and soil type (Divakara and Das 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%