Morphological variation and covariation in mandibular molars of platyrrhine primates

Abstract

Molars are highly integrated biological structures that have been used for inferring evolutionary relationships among taxa. However, parallel and convergent morphological traits can be affected by developmental and functional constraints. Here, we analyze molar shapes of platyrrhines in order to explore if platyrrhine molar diversity reflects homogeneous patterns of molar variation and covariation. We digitized 30 landmarks on mandibular first and second molars of 418 extant and 11 fossil platyrrhine specimens to determine the degree of integration of both molars when treated as a single module. We combined morphological and phylogenetic data to investigate the phylogenetic signal and to visualize the history of molar shape changes. All platyrrhine taxa show a common shape pattern suggesting that a relatively low degree of phenotypic variation is caused by convergent evolution, although molar shape carries significant phylogenetic signal. Atelidae and Pitheciidae show high levels of integration with low variation between the two molars, whereas the Cebinae/Saimiriinae, and especially Callitrichinae, show greater variation between molars and trend toward a modular organization. We hypothesize that biomechanical constraints of the masticatory apparatus, and the dietary profile of each taxon are the main factors that determine high covariation in molars. In contrast, low molar shape covariation may result from the fact that each molar exhibits a distinct ecological signal, as molars can be exposed to distinct occlusal loadings during food processing, suggesting that different selective pressures on molars can reduce overall molar integration.

Genetic correlations in the dental dimensions ofSaguinus fuscicollis

“…Estimates of ρ G between mandibular premolar dimensions were in the upper range of mandibular ρ G estimates, as were ρ G estimates between mandibular molar dimensions, possibly indicating weak genetic modularity by tooth type in the mandibular dentition (Figure b). Genetic correlations between M 1 and M 2 dimensions were positive and high, with the exception of M 1 length‐ M 2 breadth, despite a tendency toward reduced morphological integration in callitrichine mandibular molars (Delgado, Pérez‐Pérez, & Galbany, ). There was stronger evidence of genetic modularity by tooth type in estimated crown areas: premolar crown areas were highly genetically correlated, yet they were also closely correlated with canine crown areas (Figure c).…”