2005
DOI: 10.1139/b04-152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological variation in leaf domatia enables coexistence of antagonistic mites in Cinnamomum camphora

Abstract: We examined variation in Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl (Lauraceae) leaf domatium morphology with respect to domatium inhabitants in the tree's natural habitats. Canonical discriminant analysis revealed that domatium morphology could be classified into four different types: pouch type, domatia with a narrow (about 0.06 mm) pubescent opening; pubescent pit type, domatia with a wider (about 0.21 mm) pubescent opening; glabrous pit type, domatia similar to the pubescent pit type but with a glabrous opening; an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
33
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…observ.). Nishida et al (2005) have found habitat segregation among mites of different sizes (i.e. taxonomic groups), i.e., whereas smaller mites inhabited the smaller domatia of Cinnamomum camphora (L.), an inverse pattern occurred for larger mites, which inhabited larger domatia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…observ.). Nishida et al (2005) have found habitat segregation among mites of different sizes (i.e. taxonomic groups), i.e., whereas smaller mites inhabited the smaller domatia of Cinnamomum camphora (L.), an inverse pattern occurred for larger mites, which inhabited larger domatia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Their most common shapes are pit (i.e., invaginations of leaf surface that reach the mesophyll), pocket (cavities beneath expanded veins), dense hair-tufts, or an association between hair-tufts and pits or pockets (O'Dowd & Willson 1989, Nishida et al 2005. The main inhabitants of leaf domatia are mites, especially predators of the families Phytoseiidae and Stigmaeidae; fungivores of the groups Tarsonemidae, Winterschmidtiidae and Oribatida are also typically common (revised in Romero & Benson 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On saplings of the South American rainforest tree Cupania vernalis (Sapindaceae), Romero and Benson ( 2004 ) found that eriophyoids were the most common mites in domatia and far more common on leaves with open as opposed to blocked domatia, although without obvious damage to the plants. Nishida et al ( 2005 ) also found eriophyoid mites the most common group in the domatia of Camphor Laurel, although when predatory phytoseiid mites were present eriophyoids were found only in domatia with openings too small for the 8 Mites on Plants 309 predators. During outbreaks of eriophyoids in Queensland rainforests, the leaf undersides including any domatia present can harbour large numbers of eriophyoid mites, but this is usually a transient phenomenon: eriophyoid numbers quickly drop (presumably due to predation) and domatia are rarely galled.…”
Section: What Lives In Leaf Domatia?mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Cryptocarya , Lauraceae), certain species have simple tuft domatia, while others have more elaborate domes or pockets in the same location. An even greater diversity of domatial forms can be found in shrubs in the genus Viburnum (Adoxaceae) (Weber et al 2012 ) anda diversity of forms can be wound even within a single leaf (Nishida et al 2005 ). This pattern of differently formed structures found in the same position in related species is moderately strong evidence for functional homology with a genetic basis.…”
Section: Fig 811mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation