2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-007-9072-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphological variation of Keratella cochlearis (Gosse) in Myanmar (Burma) in relation to zooplankton community structure

Abstract: Keratella cochlearis was present in 27 of 35 water bodies sampled in Myanmar, and was the most abundant rotifer in 10. Measurements of lorica length and posterior spine length from 20 localities showed that posterior spine length varied both with lorica length and with the composition of the crustacean zooplankton. Long spines were associated with dominance by Heliodiaptomus. The shortest spines were found in samples dominated by cladocerans or cyclopoid copepods. Posterior spine length was positively correlat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphological differences between the two clone populations in our study are consistent with the general consensus that K. cochlearis in lakes with lower food availability (e.g. Tinaja lake) tend to be longer and have longer spines than those living in eutrophic conditions (Hillbricht-Ilkowska, 1972;Diéguez et al, 1998;Green, 2007). The fitness benefit of a longer PSL in the Tinaja clone is likely to be a reduced sinking rate (Stemberger, 1990;Zagarese and Marinone, 1992).…”
Section: Morphological Variation In K Cochlearis Genetic and Environmental Controlssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The morphological differences between the two clone populations in our study are consistent with the general consensus that K. cochlearis in lakes with lower food availability (e.g. Tinaja lake) tend to be longer and have longer spines than those living in eutrophic conditions (Hillbricht-Ilkowska, 1972;Diéguez et al, 1998;Green, 2007). The fitness benefit of a longer PSL in the Tinaja clone is likely to be a reduced sinking rate (Stemberger, 1990;Zagarese and Marinone, 1992).…”
Section: Morphological Variation In K Cochlearis Genetic and Environmental Controlssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The PSL and lorica size of K. cochlearis can also affect fitness and competitive ability. There is a general consensus from field observations that K. cochlearis tends to be longer and have longer spines in lakes with lower versus higher food availability (Hillbricht-Ilkowska, 1972;Green, 2007;Gopko and Telesh, 2013). However, the specific effect of temperature could not be controlled in these studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ESUs 3 and 6, respectively). Hofmann (1983) and Green (2005Green ( , 2007 noted that tecta specimens could not be explained by allometric growth because specimens with spines were smaller than those without spines. Green (2005) presented three hypotheses of the origin of spineless K. cochlearis: 1, true tecta (appearing only in colder periods of the year as the ''end'' of the posterior spine reduction); 2, aspina (truly spineless, absent in the winter, LL longer than in spined form); 3, ecaudata (the same dorsal structure, occurring in summer, LL longer than in spined form).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, the presence and length of the posterior spine seems to be a morphological character whose suitability for discriminating species is questionable. In eutrophic habitats, K. cochlearis tends to be smaller and has smaller posterior spines than in oligotrophic habitats (Green, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, during the restoration of lake ecosystems, both nutrient concentration and phytoplankton abundance decrease, and large-sized species gradually replace small-sized species in zooplankton communities. Other than the decreased predation efficiency of fish, low edible algal density is considered to be main reason for succession of zooplankton communities (Die ´guez et al, 1998;Green, 2007;Jeppesen et al, 2007;Louette et al, 2009;Qin, 2009;Zeng et al, 2017). From a microevolutionary perspective, these zooplankton populations can adapt to low algal densities in oligotrophic lakes, and high algal densities in eutrophic lakes (Scheuerl & Stelzer, 2013;Declerck & Papakostas, 2017), but experimental evidence for this is scarce (Ramos-Rodrı ´guez et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%