Abstract:Background : Appendicitis is one of the most common clinical conditions that require emergency surgery. Variations in anatomical location of appendix can result in different clinical presentations. Anatomical and topographical variations of the caecum are also known to occur. Anatomical variations in caecum have been observed along with the appendix in this study. Aims: To study the variations in the size, shape, position and arterial supply of the caecum and appendix in individuals of different sex and age, a… Show more
“…In a laparoscopic study by Gupta et al [11] in New Delhi, the mean length and width of the appendix were reported 6.8 cm and 0.87 cm in children, while these values were 5.25 cm and 0.72 cm in adult. The length of the Indian cadavers ranges between 5.9 and 10.21 and the values obtained for thickness ranges from 0.46 cm to 0.7 cm [2,3,8,22]. In the present study, the appendix length and width were longer than those in Indian population (12.17 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…There was remarkable variation of appendix position in different regions of Asia. The most frequent position of the appendix was found retrocaecal in India [3,15,22,25] ranging from 55.5% to 68%. The most common location of the vermiform appendix was retroileal in Thai population [5], while pelvic was a predominant position in Iranian cadavers [9,10,24], which was inconsistent with our finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some different findings about appendix size in Asian population. The length of the appendix in the Indian cadavers ranges between 5.9 and 10.21, while the range of the appendix thickness was from 0.46 cm to 0.7 cm [2,3,8,22]. The mean length of appendix was reported 6.03 cm in Thailand [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value obtained for weight ranges from 6.33 cm to 8.57 cm in Iranian population [9,10,24]. The common position of the appendix was retrocaecal in India [3,15,22,25], retroileal in Thailand and pelvic in Iran [9,10,24].…”
Having standard data on the vermiform appendix is useful for clinicians as well as anthropologists. The findings of the present study can provide information about morphologic variations of the appendix in Iranian population.
“…In a laparoscopic study by Gupta et al [11] in New Delhi, the mean length and width of the appendix were reported 6.8 cm and 0.87 cm in children, while these values were 5.25 cm and 0.72 cm in adult. The length of the Indian cadavers ranges between 5.9 and 10.21 and the values obtained for thickness ranges from 0.46 cm to 0.7 cm [2,3,8,22]. In the present study, the appendix length and width were longer than those in Indian population (12.17 mm and 0.46 mm, respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…There was remarkable variation of appendix position in different regions of Asia. The most frequent position of the appendix was found retrocaecal in India [3,15,22,25] ranging from 55.5% to 68%. The most common location of the vermiform appendix was retroileal in Thai population [5], while pelvic was a predominant position in Iranian cadavers [9,10,24], which was inconsistent with our finding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some different findings about appendix size in Asian population. The length of the appendix in the Indian cadavers ranges between 5.9 and 10.21, while the range of the appendix thickness was from 0.46 cm to 0.7 cm [2,3,8,22]. The mean length of appendix was reported 6.03 cm in Thailand [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value obtained for weight ranges from 6.33 cm to 8.57 cm in Iranian population [9,10,24]. The common position of the appendix was retrocaecal in India [3,15,22,25], retroileal in Thailand and pelvic in Iran [9,10,24].…”
Having standard data on the vermiform appendix is useful for clinicians as well as anthropologists. The findings of the present study can provide information about morphologic variations of the appendix in Iranian population.
“…The adult incidence is 0.00009% in south-east Asian countries; however it varies from 0.09-4% in Indian population. [4][5][6] Discrete existence of sub-hepatic caecum and dilated with looped sigmoid colon has been described by many authors. [3][4][5][6] The aim of this report is to highlight co-existence of subhepatic caecum and dilated with looped sigmoid colon at variant position in abdominal cavity.…”
Introduction: We encountered variation in the placement of large intestine in abdominal cavity of a 76-years-old male cadaver during dissection of abdominal cavity. The work was performed in Department of Anatomy during routine MBBS teaching sessions. The aim of this paper is to report coexistence of error of mid-gut development and along with variant topo-morphology of sigmoid colon in the same cadaver. Case Report: Sub-hepatic caecum with high riding vermiform appendix with absent ascending colon was seen on the right side of abdominal cavity. Concomitantly on the left side of the abdominal cavity dilated, looped sigmoid colon occupied the left hypochondrium, left lumbar region and left iliac fossa. We report these findings along with the embryological basis and clinical significance. Conclusion: An insight about the errors in development of mid-gut resulting into the variant topography of caecum will facilitate surgeons and radiologists in prompt diagnosis and quick modification of the protocol during invasive procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.