2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologically modified CuO nanorod structure @ stainless steel as high performing supercapacitor electrode prepared by spray pyrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of analytical efficacy between the as-fabricated electrode and other electrochemical and non-electrochemical methods was performed for KYN and TRP (Table 3). As shown in Table 3, the detection limit and linear range of the as-fabricated sensor were better than electrochemical and non-electrochemical methods (Zhao et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2023;Kambale and Lokhande, 2023;Zhao et al, 2023;Taherizadeh et al, 2023;Guo et al, 2023). When comparing chromatography methods with electrochemical methods, these methods are expensive, sophisticated, and multi-process techniques, with the need for sample preparation, pre-filtration, extraction, and temperature monitoring.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Methods With Others In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of analytical efficacy between the as-fabricated electrode and other electrochemical and non-electrochemical methods was performed for KYN and TRP (Table 3). As shown in Table 3, the detection limit and linear range of the as-fabricated sensor were better than electrochemical and non-electrochemical methods (Zhao et al, 2010;Wu et al, 2023;Kambale and Lokhande, 2023;Zhao et al, 2023;Taherizadeh et al, 2023;Guo et al, 2023). When comparing chromatography methods with electrochemical methods, these methods are expensive, sophisticated, and multi-process techniques, with the need for sample preparation, pre-filtration, extraction, and temperature monitoring.…”
Section: Comparison Of Our Methods With Others In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was demonstrated that electrochemical approaches are efficient analytical procedures with the following characteristics: easy to use, rapid response, inexpensiveness, and portability ( Akbari et al, 2020 ; Iranmanesh et al, 2020 ; Moarefdoust et al, 2021 ; Antherjanam and Saraswathyamma, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2023 ; Cai et al, 2023 ; Tang et al, 2023 ; Wan et al, 2023 ). In fact, scholars have increased the sensitivity for detecting the electroactive analytes using chemical modifiers and a wide range of nanomaterials have been applied to determine the analytes ( Wu et al, 2023 ; Kambale and Lokhande, 2023 ; Zhao et al, 2023 ; Taherizadeh et al, 2023 ; Guo et al, 2023 ; Ghasemi et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, we can drive innovation, foster continuous improvement, and achieve remarkable advancements in the field of energy storage. In 2023, Kambale et al used spray pyrolysis to produce copper oxide (CuO) nanorods (17). The obtained CuO electrode was extremely appropriate for supercapacitor applications since it had a maximum specific energy of 108.18 Wh/kg and had outstanding cycling stability by maintaining 87.78% of its capacitance after 5000 cycles.…”
Section: Nanostructure-enhanced Supercapacitor Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of pseudocapacitive applications, ruthenium oxide is ideal, but its scarcity, high cost, and toxic nature prevent its wide application [10][11][12][13][14][15]. Therefore, additional metal oxides were the subject of research, such as, CuO [16,17], Co 3 O 4 [1,18], MnO 2 [19,20], Mn 3 O 4 [21], MoO 3 [22], and NiO [23] etc. The Co 3 O 4 stands out among these metal oxides for its enhanced electrochemical performance, improved catalytic property, inexpensive, and minimally harmful nature [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%