“…All OCT images were stored in DICOM format and analyzed offline with dedicated software (OFR, Pulse Medical Imaging Technology, Shanghai, Co., Ltd.) [24], which measured the quantitative planimetry of plaque characteristics by automatic border detection followed by manual correction, and each area of lipid, fibrous, calcium and macrophage components was measured frame by frame to determine the corresponding volumes in the measured segment PLOS ONE [24]. Finally, the quantitative indicators of each plaque component were recorded in accordance with previous studies, as follows [3,10,25]: external elastic membrane area (EEM area ) was defined as the cross-sectional area of the EEM, lumen area (Lumen area ) was defined as the cross-sectional area of the lumen, normalized total atheroma volume (TAVn) was calculated as S(EEM area -Lumen area )/number of frames of target segment×100, percent atheroma volume (PAV) was calculated as S(EEM area -Lumen area )/SEEM area ×100, lipid TAVn was defined as Slipid area /number of frames of target segment×100), lipid PAV was defined as Slipid area /SEE-M area ×100, fibrous TAVn was defined as Sfibrous area /number of frames of target seg-ment×100, fibrous PAV was defined as Sfibrous area /SEEM area ×100, calcium TAVn was defined as Scalcium area /number of frames of target segment×100, calcium PAV was defined as Scalcium area /SEEM area ×100, macrophage TAVn was defined as Smacrophage area /number of frames of target segment×100, and macrophage PAV was defined as Smacrophage area /SEE-M area ×100. The change in TAVn (ΔTAVn) was defined as the TAVn at the 1-year follow-up minus the baseline TAVn, which could be derived from lipid ΔTAVn, fibrous ΔTAVn, calcium ΔTAVn or macrophage ΔTAVn.…”