2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologies of copper deposits obtained by the electrodeposition at high overpotentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
94
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
94
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For well over a century it has been known, however, that the layer deposited during electrodeposition is prone to morphological instabilities, leading to ramified growth of the electrode surface. Over the years, many experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies have been devoted to increasing the understanding of this ramified growth regime [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Big contributions to our understanding of the growth process have come from diffusion-limited aggregation (DLA) models [21,22] and, more recently, phasefield models similar to those that have successfully been applied to solidification problems [23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For well over a century it has been known, however, that the layer deposited during electrodeposition is prone to morphological instabilities, leading to ramified growth of the electrode surface. Over the years, many experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies have been devoted to increasing the understanding of this ramified growth regime [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Big contributions to our understanding of the growth process have come from diffusion-limited aggregation (DLA) models [21,22] and, more recently, phasefield models similar to those that have successfully been applied to solidification problems [23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentiostatic deposition technique is essentially used to investigate the nucleation and growth process through current-time transient [18]. For instance, at lower applied potentials, anisotropic branched dendrites were obtained in Cu electrodeposition [19]. The extent of branching of these dendrites was increased at higher applied potentials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrodeposition technique was shown to be very favorable way for the production of this type of electrodes [1,2,4]. Open porous copper electrodes, denoted as both 3-D foam [1,2,4] or honeycomb-like electrodes [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], are formed by electrodeposition at high current densities and overpotentials, when, parallel to electrodeposition process, the hydrogen evolution reaction occurs. The main characteristics of these electrodes are holes or pores formed upon detachment of hydrogen bubbles, surrounded by the agglomerates of metal grains or dendritic particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific surface area of these structures is determined by the number and size of the holes, as well as by the width of the walls in-between [4]. Aside from copper, which is the most studied system [1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], open porous structures of some other technologically important metals, such as tin [1], nickel [16], silver [17,18], gold [19], lead [20], and copper-tin alloys [2], were also investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%