“…The present Epistylis can be distinguished from other Epistylis species by the following morphological characteristics: (1) body shape of several species is not vase shape, such as E. aselli Stiller, 1941, E. gammari Precht, 1935, E. helicostylum Vavra, (1962) and E. hentscheli Kahl, (1935) (vs. body shape of the present Epistylis is vase shape (Vavra, 1962; Foissner et al, 1992; Shen and Gu, 2016); (2) peristomial lips of several species are double layer, such as E. chrysemydis Bishop and Jahn, 1941 and E. clampi Hongwei and Overstreet, 2006 (vs. peristomial lip of the present Epistylis is single layer) (Hongwei and Overstreet, 2006; Jiang et al, 2016); (3) contractile vacuoles of several species are on the ventral wall of infundibulum, such as E. acuminata Song, 1986, E. chlorelligerum Shen, 1980 and E. nympharum Engelmann, 1862 (vs. contractile vacuole of the present Epistylis is on the dorsal wall of infundibulum) (Song, 1986; Foissner et al, 1992; Jiang et al, 2016); (4) peristomial disks of several Epistylis species are gradient, such as E. chlorelligerum and E. vaginula Stokes, 1884 (vs. peristomial disk of present Epistylis is semicircular) (Jiang et al, 2016; Shen and Gu, 2016) (5) contractile vacuole of several species are above peristomial lip, such as E. acuminata , E. aselli , E. clampi , E. harpaticola Kahl, 1933, E. plicatilis Ehrenberg, 1838 and E. vaginula (vs. contractile vacuole of the present Epistylis is below peristomial lip) (Song, 1991; Hong and Overstreet, 2006; Shi et al, 2014; Shen and Gu, 2016; (6) macronuclei of several species are J-shaped or band-shaped, such as E. elongata Stokes, 1889 and E. nympharum (vs. macronucleus of the present Epistylis is C-shaped) (Kahl, 1935; Foissner et al, 1992). Detailed comparisons are presented in Table 5.…”