2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and phylogeny of Bryophryoides ocellatus n. g., n. sp. (Ciliophora, Colpodea) from in situ soil percolates of Idaho, U.S.A.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous work, and in our study, B. pulchra was always the earliest divergent branch of Colpodida in the SSU-rRNA gene tree, which means it has been stable between Colpodida and Cyrtolophosidida (Bourland et al, 2011;Dunthorn et al, 2012;Rajter et al, 2020;Vďačný & Foissner, 2019). But, we established multiple gene trees and they all confirmed the instability of the position of B. pulchra in Colpodida.…”
Section: Bardeliella Pulchra Evolutionary Positionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In previous work, and in our study, B. pulchra was always the earliest divergent branch of Colpodida in the SSU-rRNA gene tree, which means it has been stable between Colpodida and Cyrtolophosidida (Bourland et al, 2011;Dunthorn et al, 2012;Rajter et al, 2020;Vďačný & Foissner, 2019). But, we established multiple gene trees and they all confirmed the instability of the position of B. pulchra in Colpodida.…”
Section: Bardeliella Pulchra Evolutionary Positionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Bromeliothrix has a ciliary and silverline pattern typical for members of the family Colpodidae, and its basic organization of the oral apparatus is also the same as that known from genera of Colpodidae families (Foissner, 2010;Foissner et al, 2002). Foissner pointed out that Bromeliothrix neither belong to the Exocolpodidae nor the Hausmanniellidae due to its complex morphological characteristics, and several phylogenetic analyses based on SSU rRNA gene sequence also indicated that B. discoideus was more closely related to a clade formed by large Colpoda species than with Hausmanniella discoidea, a type of the hausmanniellids (Bourland et al, 2011;Dunthorn et al, 2008).…”
Section: Paracolpoda and Bromeliothrix Phylogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Colpodea are recognized as a taxon based on the presence of the LKm (left kinetodesmal) fiber in the somatic ciliature (Lynn 1976;Small and Lynn 1981;Foissner 1993), molecular support for monophyly from nuclear SSU-rDNA data was lacking in an earlier study when all potentially closely related outgroups were included (Dunthorn et al 2008). Later nuclear and mictochondrial SSU-rDNA analyses did not sample sufficient outgroups to allow for a meaningful test of monophyly (Lynn et al 1999;Lasek-Nesselquist and Katz 2001;Dunthorn et al 2008Dunthorn et al , 2009Foissner and Stoeck 2009;Bourland et al 2011;Dunthorn et al 2011;Foissner et al 2011;Quintela-Alonso et al 2011;Bourland et al 2012;Dunthorn, Katz, et al 2012;Bourland et al 2013;Foissner et al 2013). With the increased taxon sampling here, the Colpodea are inferred to be monophyletic with PairDist, RAxML, and MrBayes; we obtain high bipartition support for this relationship only from PairDist and MrBayes.…”
Section: A Broadly Sampled Ciliate Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All colpodean species that have been described in enough detail have micronuclei (e.g., Bourland et al, 2013;Dunthorn et al, 2009;Foissner, 1993;Foissner et al, 2014;Quintela-Alonso et al, 2011). As micronuclei are only involved in sex (as far as we know), we propose that this cytological feature would have been lost over evolutionary time if the colpodeans are asexual.…”
Section: Genomic Data Support Secretive Sex In Colpodeansmentioning
confidence: 89%