2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8181(00)00073-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and sedimentology of a giant supraglacial, ice-walled, jökulhlaup channel, Skeiðarárjökull, Iceland: implications for esker genesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These large-scale polymodal cross-strata are similar in scale and texture to those found in high-energy fluvial settings (O'Connor, 1993;Carling, 1996) and on delta/subaqueous outwash fans (Martini, 1990;Nemec, 1990;Nemec et al, 1999). Largescale, polymodal, graded, cross-strata could represent the simultaneous deposition of traction and suspended load Knudsen, 1999a,b, 2002;Russell et al, 2001;Benvenuti and Martini, 2002;Carling et al, 2002), but may also suggest debris-flow activity generated on delta foresets (Allen, 1984;Nemec, 1990;Nemec et al, 1999). Massive cross-strata grade vertically into silty sands, which represent lower energy deposition and a reduction in sedimentation rate ( Fig.…”
Section: Sections 1-3: Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These large-scale polymodal cross-strata are similar in scale and texture to those found in high-energy fluvial settings (O'Connor, 1993;Carling, 1996) and on delta/subaqueous outwash fans (Martini, 1990;Nemec, 1990;Nemec et al, 1999). Largescale, polymodal, graded, cross-strata could represent the simultaneous deposition of traction and suspended load Knudsen, 1999a,b, 2002;Russell et al, 2001;Benvenuti and Martini, 2002;Carling et al, 2002), but may also suggest debris-flow activity generated on delta foresets (Allen, 1984;Nemec, 1990;Nemec et al, 1999). Massive cross-strata grade vertically into silty sands, which represent lower energy deposition and a reduction in sedimentation rate ( Fig.…”
Section: Sections 1-3: Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Sedimentary evidence within sections 1-3 suggests repeated, very high-energy subaerial depositional events (jökulhlaups) flowing directly into the Lundy from the north. These deposits are wholly incompatible with deposition from low-magnitude meltwater flows and fulfill all criteria for jökulhlaup deposition (Maizels and Russell, 1992;Maizels, 1993Maizels, , 1997Russell, 1994;Knudsen, 1999a,b, 2002;Russell and Marren, 1999;Russell et al, 2001;Marren, 2002). The present topography of the Lundy-Cour area requires meltwater associated with jökulhlaup deposition in the upper pit to drain in a westerly direction through the Lundy Channel (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Existing models of jökulhlaup sedimentation are only applicable to proglacial settings (e.g. Maizels, 1993aMaizels, ,b, 1997, whereas recent research recognizes that a range of sub-, en-and supraglacial depositional environments can potentially exist during jökulhlaups (Russell, 1994;Tweed and Russell, 1999;van der Meer et al, 1999;Roberts et al, 2000a, b;Russell et al, 2001). These recent findings call for a greater recognition and understanding of glaciofluvial processes operating within glaciers during jökulhlaups.…”
Section: J Roberts Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rhythmic nature of sand and gravel couplets signifies major flow pulsations, as observed elsewhere within high-energy slackwater locations during the November 1996 jökulhlaup (cf. Russell and Knudsen, 1999b;Russell et al, 2001). The fact that crude bedding within the pipe itself could be traced upwards into a mushroom-shaped unit consisting of a transition from vertical to horizontal beds, demonstrates that deposition within the pipe occurred simultaneously with overlying sediments.…”
Section: Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deposition of an esker happens within or in front of the tunnel mouth (Banerjee and McDonald 1975;Mäkinen 2003;Boulton et al 2009), within the subglacial (Syverson et al 1994;Warren and Ashley 1994;Brennand 2000;Campbell 2003;Boulton et al 2009) or englacial (Syverson et al 1994;Campbell 2003;Burke et al 2009) tunnels, or even in the supraglacial environment (Russell et al 2001). Eskers have long been known as a natural source of groundwater (De Geer 1968;Parsons 1970;Artimo et al 2003;Bolduc et al 2006;Okkonen et al 2010), and they are effective sites for MAR (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%