1976
DOI: 10.1016/0025-3227(76)90052-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology and structure of the Galapagos Rise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of their orientations and position, faults are categorized into three populations: ridge‐parallel faults (270–290°), transform‐parallel faults (338°–348°), and transform‐oblique faults (290°–335°) (Figure 4). Ridge‐ and transform‐parallel fault populations are consistent with gross seafloor morphology identified in some of the earliest regional studies of the GSC [e.g., Johnson et al , 1976]. The transform‐oblique fault population has not been previously described, but the presence of a transtensional regional stress field was predicted because of the oblique orientation of the GTF relative to both the ridge axes and the spreading direction [e.g., Harpp and Geist , 2002; Harpp et al , 2003].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of their orientations and position, faults are categorized into three populations: ridge‐parallel faults (270–290°), transform‐parallel faults (338°–348°), and transform‐oblique faults (290°–335°) (Figure 4). Ridge‐ and transform‐parallel fault populations are consistent with gross seafloor morphology identified in some of the earliest regional studies of the GSC [e.g., Johnson et al , 1976]. The transform‐oblique fault population has not been previously described, but the presence of a transtensional regional stress field was predicted because of the oblique orientation of the GTF relative to both the ridge axes and the spreading direction [e.g., Harpp and Geist , 2002; Harpp et al , 2003].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant offsets of this conduit at transform faults may act as dams and impede the flow, resulting in mass accumulations (shallow axial depths) on the upflow side of the offsets (Vogt and Johnson, 1975). These concepts have been utilized to explain topographic gradients and offsets along the spreading center away from Iceland, the Azores, the central Juan de Fuca Ridge (Vogt and Johnson, 1975), and the Galapagos Islands (Vogt, 1976;Johnson and others, 1976).…”
Section: Topographic Profile Along the Epr Crestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GSC passes to the north of the Galapagos Islands and roughly bisects the area between the Cocos Ridge, an aseismic ridge trending northeast, and the Carnegie Ridge, an aseismic ridge trending southeast from the islands. Two recent reviews have been made of the tectonic and geophysical setting of the Galapagos region [Hey, 1977;Johnson et al, 1976]. The following summary relies heavily on these two sources.Paper number 80B0388.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%