2003
DOI: 10.1002/app.13273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology–composition–processing relationships in poly(methyl methacrylate)–polytriethylene glycol dimethacrylate shrinkage‐controlled blends

Abstract: An innovative method to control shrinkage in polymer blends, by using N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine to produce phase separation in an acrylic system, was applied to synthesize polymer blends from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and polytriethylene glycol dimethacrylate (PTEG-DMA). The morphology of several compositions, as analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, reveals microdomains as a function of the specific composition, in contrast to conventional MMA-TEGDMA copolymers synthesized by thermal decomposition of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The later development of the secondary phase can lead to nano/micro-scale cavitation at the interface or within the primary phase. This can compensate for some of the initial volumetric shrinkage occurring in the primary phase, resulting in an overall shrinkage reduction due to phase separation[1, 7, 9]. In the TEGDMA/prepolymer model used here, the linkage between the primary and secondary phases is due to the presence of TEGDMA in both phases as well as physical entanglements involving the prepolymer chains integrated into the bulk homopolymer matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The later development of the secondary phase can lead to nano/micro-scale cavitation at the interface or within the primary phase. This can compensate for some of the initial volumetric shrinkage occurring in the primary phase, resulting in an overall shrinkage reduction due to phase separation[1, 7, 9]. In the TEGDMA/prepolymer model used here, the linkage between the primary and secondary phases is due to the presence of TEGDMA in both phases as well as physical entanglements involving the prepolymer chains integrated into the bulk homopolymer matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the use of thermo-activated systems in general produces greater internal stresses due to post-polymerization curing contraction effects that can generate poorly controlled micro-/macro-void formation in phase-separated polymers. Alternatively, the use of photopolymerizable systems, either purely free-radical [67,73,74] or free-radical/cationic hybrids [41], has the advantage of room-temperature processing, which limits the temperature rise to the exotherm of the reaction. Moreover, the polymerization can be started on demand after the material is in place.…”
Section: Control Of Phase Formation: Same and Dissimilar Polymerizatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence has been presented for the impact of reaction kinetics on macromolecular diffusion and gelation, ultimately dictating final polymer structure and properties in all methacrylate systems, without the addition of prepolymers [58]. Processing conditions such as temperature [73,74], irradiance (for photopolymerizable systems) [36], and initiator concentration [42] are of key importance in determining phase-separation behavior since they directly control reaction kinetics and onset of gelation. In thermally polymerized materials, temperature has two distinct and, more often than not, antagonist effects.…”
Section: Control Of Phase Formation: Kinetics Of Polymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations