Chronotropic, dromotropic or hypotensive "vagal responses" elicited by high frequency stimulation alone or in combination with anatomic data derived from the literature have been employed to identify juxtacardiac neural targets as adjunct therapy during ablation of myocardial substrates of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. In particular, attention has been directed to the ganglionated plexuses nested in atrial epicardial fatty tissues as prime targets for ablation. Experimental studies in which atrial tachyarrhythmias were induced by stimulation of the mediastinal nerve inputs to the ganglionated plexuses in canines, show spatial concordance between the tachyarrhythmia sites of origin and the atrial distribution of repolarization changes determined from up to 255 simultaneously recorded unipolar electrograms. Such changes usually occurred in the absence of any chronotropic effect in response to left-sided nerve stimulation. Experimental studies also show that the atrial and ventricular ganglionated plexuses form an interconnected network exerting redundant control over sinus and atrioventricular node function as well as atrial refractoriness. It is concluded that ablative therapy targeting the intrinsic cardiac nervous system in individual patients can hardly be based on a priori anatomic generalizations and that functional measures derived from the entire atrial muscle surfaces (repolarization changes) should be required to identify putative neural targets.
The clinical issueClinical studies support the notion that targeting juxtacardiac nerves may be useful adjunct therapy to pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of select atrial muscle structures for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation [1][2][3]. Chronotropic (sinus node), dromotropic (atrioventricular [AV] node) or hypotensive "vagal responses" elicited by high frequency stimulation have been employed to identify neural atrial targets for ablation [1,2,4,5]. Alternatively, extensive ablation of putative ganglionated plexus areas has been proposed as a purely anatomical approach [6,7] based on published anatomic data [8,9] and, recently, in combination with high frequency stimulation of selected nerve sites to confirm neural activity [10]. Therefore, there is a need for precise delineation of juxtacardiac nerves involved in the initiation of atrial tachyarrhythmias and clarification of their regional functional influences throughout the atria in relation to tachyarrhythmia sites of origin, beyond chronotropic and dromotropic effects related to sinus node and AV node modulation. It is conceivable that clinically relevant neural sites might be missed if high frequency stimulation applied at such sites induced undetected regional changes in atrial refractoriness without inducing chronotropic, dromotropic or pressor responses.