2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of contorted fluid structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reach of the surface plays an important role here since it is the scale which separates the zones in scale space where depends only on integral geometric measures (, , ) and the range of scales for which two-point statistics become a morphological descriptor (Torquato 2002) for which both the geometry and the additional information about the medial axis is required for the structure to be characterized. For scales larger than the reach, the separation cannot be interpreted as the size of the structure under consideration (as it will be seen later, the correlation tends to 0 when the scale is similar to the size of the structure), but should rather be referred to as the morphological parameter as it is generally done in morphological analysis using, for example, integral geometrical measures (the Minkowski functional) of parallel sets (Arns, Knackstedt & Mecke 2004; Dumouchel, Thiesset & Ménard 2022).…”
Section: Analytical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reach of the surface plays an important role here since it is the scale which separates the zones in scale space where depends only on integral geometric measures (, , ) and the range of scales for which two-point statistics become a morphological descriptor (Torquato 2002) for which both the geometry and the additional information about the medial axis is required for the structure to be characterized. For scales larger than the reach, the separation cannot be interpreted as the size of the structure under consideration (as it will be seen later, the correlation tends to 0 when the scale is similar to the size of the structure), but should rather be referred to as the morphological parameter as it is generally done in morphological analysis using, for example, integral geometrical measures (the Minkowski functional) of parallel sets (Arns, Knackstedt & Mecke 2004; Dumouchel, Thiesset & Ménard 2022).…”
Section: Analytical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to the number of droplets in a flow, the Euler characteristic of an interface is an integer-valued topological invariant, and any change in its value requires a splitting or merging of interfaces. Despite its physical significance, the Euler characteristic has only recently been applied to multiphase flows: Dumouchel, Thiesset & Ménard (2022) linked the Euler characteristic to the Gaussian curvature of the droplets and used it to parametrize the morphology of liquid droplets undergoing breakup. The Euler characteristic is commonly used in characterizing the sintering of metal powders (DeHoff, Aigeltinger & Craig 1972;Mendoza et al 2006), classifying lung tissues (Boehm et al 2008) and correcting MRI scans of the human brain (Yotter et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%