2017
DOI: 10.3390/cryst7040100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of Spherulites in Rapidly Solidified Ni3Ge Droplets

Abstract: Abstract:The congruently melting, single phase, L1 2 intermetallic β-Ni 3 Ge has been subject to rapid solidification via drop-tube processing. Four different cooling rates are used in this process, at very low cooling rates (≥850 µm diameter particles, ≥700 K s −1 ) and slightly higher cooling rates (850-500 µm diameter particles, 700-1386 K s −1 ) the dominant solidification morphology, revealed after etching, is that of isolated spherulites in an otherwise featureless matrix. At higher cooling rates, (500-3… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We conclude that the contrast displayed by etching is because of incomplete chemical ordering, causing the etchant to attack the disordered material and leaving the ordered material unaffected. The lower chemical resistance of the disordered phase has resulted in this type of differential etching between ordered and disordered material to be observed previously in other intermetallic compounds [11,13]. The maximum hardness, 824 Hv0.05, was observed in smallest size drop-tube sample (212 -150 m diameter particles).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…We conclude that the contrast displayed by etching is because of incomplete chemical ordering, causing the etchant to attack the disordered material and leaving the ordered material unaffected. The lower chemical resistance of the disordered phase has resulted in this type of differential etching between ordered and disordered material to be observed previously in other intermetallic compounds [11,13]. The maximum hardness, 824 Hv0.05, was observed in smallest size drop-tube sample (212 -150 m diameter particles).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…EBSD does not appear to be able to distinguish between the ordered and disordered variants of the -Ni3Ge compound in these samples, this seemingly being a consequence of the additional lines in the resulting Kikuchi pattern being relatively weak, coupled with the small spatial extent of the ordered features in these samples. In fact, we have shown elsewhere [43] that the ordered regions are only consistently distinguished from the disordered regions once their projection area approaches 300 m 2 or greater. The previous XRD analysis, showing that all samples are single-phase -Ni3Ge is confirmed by the EBSD phase maps (not shown).…”
Section: Relationship Between Dendrite Fragmentation and Grain Refinementioning
confidence: 72%
“…In fact, this is exactly what is observed. For sieve fraction between 850-300 m non-dendritic solidification morphologies are observed, with the dominant morphology being spherulites, as discussed in [43]. Dendritic fragmentation (pl > br) is predicted for droplets > 150 m in diameter, but for droplets > 300 m in diameter growth to the ordered L12 phase is predicted as insufficient undercooling is attained for disordered growth.…”
Section: Estimation Of Dendrite Fragmentationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A reliable description of the solidification dynamics of Ni3Ge can be assembled from the SEM, TEM [13,17,18] For the spherulite morphology the TEM evidence is that the 'featureless' matrix is, as per the other morphologies, fully ordered, but the spherulites themselves are only partially disordered, consisting of alternating filaments of ordered and disordered material. The relationship between undercooling and chemical ordering was explored in detail for the Ni3Ge compound by Ahmad et al [19], with it being determined the fully disordered growth occurred for T > 168 K, this being evident by a rapid increase in growth velocity with undercooling above T = 168 K. Unfortunately, direct measurement of undercooling during drop-tube processing is not possible, although it would be expected that smaller droplets would experience higher undercooling, both because of their higher cooling rate and because of the melt sub-division effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%