1966
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(66)90446-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of the cervix in women treated with synthetic progestins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few studies of the human cervix have been made in patients receiving this therapy. Maqueo, Azuela, Calderon, and Goldzieher (1966) studied cervical biopsies from 147 patients undergoing treatment with these preparations. Although they describe hypersecretion and glandular hyperplasia, no mention is made of aberrant glandular changes.…”
Section: Associated Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very few studies of the human cervix have been made in patients receiving this therapy. Maqueo, Azuela, Calderon, and Goldzieher (1966) studied cervical biopsies from 147 patients undergoing treatment with these preparations. Although they describe hypersecretion and glandular hyperplasia, no mention is made of aberrant glandular changes.…”
Section: Associated Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MGH was associated with patients under either endogenous or exogenous hormone effects in 51.42% of the studied cases. It is a known fact that cervix mucosa responds to estrogen hormones (8,10,18,20,22) with a proliferation of the endocervical columnar cells. The progestinic stimulation increases the consistency of the mucous, making it thick.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The histological changes seen in these two situations are similar, namely an increase in the vascularity of thc cervix, an increase in the number and size of glands, with active secretion of mucus and stromal oedema. Maqueo et al (1966) suggested that the intensity of these changes was related to the level and duration of exposurc to progestational agents, although Mingeot & Fievcz (1974) concluded that it was not possible on the available evidcncc to determine whether the oestrogenic or progestogenic component or both were responsible for the observed cervical changes. What is beyond question, however, is that all of thcse changes will tend to promote an increase in cervical vol-…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%