2019
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2019.1573047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology, phylogeny, and sexual stage ofFusarium caatingaenseandFusarium pernambucanum, new species of theFusarium incarnatum-equisetispecies complex associated with insects in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
41
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
4
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, F. bubalinum and F. monophialidicum did not produce any sporodochia on carnation leaves, whereas F. incarnatum and F. tanahbumbuense produce abundant sporodochia on carnation leaves. Notes - Santos et al (2019) introduced the Latin binomial F. caatingaense to represent phylo-species FIESC 20, which formed a distinct fully supported clade (ML & MP-BS = 100 %, PP = 1.0) in this study. This species was shown to have a heterothallic mating system, producing typical gibberella-like perithecia exuding viable ascospores.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, F. bubalinum and F. monophialidicum did not produce any sporodochia on carnation leaves, whereas F. incarnatum and F. tanahbumbuense produce abundant sporodochia on carnation leaves. Notes - Santos et al (2019) introduced the Latin binomial F. caatingaense to represent phylo-species FIESC 20, which formed a distinct fully supported clade (ML & MP-BS = 100 %, PP = 1.0) in this study. This species was shown to have a heterothallic mating system, producing typical gibberella-like perithecia exuding viable ascospores.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This species was shown to have a heterothallic mating system, producing typical gibberella-like perithecia exuding viable ascospores. This species is also characterised by the various shapes of aerial conidia (up to four) produced in culture (Santos et al 2019). Notes - Gerlach & Nirenberg (1982) studied isolate CBS 193.65 and considered it a good representative of F. camptoceras, providing illustrations that match the original description provided by Wollenweber & Reinking (1925), and drawings and description from the type isolate (R42; Wollenweber & Reinking 1925) later published in Reinking & Wollenweber (1927).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Observation and description of the reproductive structures were performed using a Nikon SMZ1000 optical microscope coupled to a digital camera. Morphological characteristics of conidia were studied based on the shape, the septation and the mean of dimensions (width and length) calculated from 30 measurements performed in the light microscope (Fourie et al, 2011;Santos et al, 2019).…”
Section: Morphological and Molecular Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%