2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology, transport characteristics and viscoelastic polymer chain confinement in nanocomposites based on thermoplastic potato starch and cellulose nanofibers from pineapple leaf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
73
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti-plasticizing effect has already been reported by other authors when evaluating this plasticizer in different combinations and with other types of starch (Gaudin et al, 2000;Chang et al, 2006;Mali et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2013). Balakrishnan et al (2017) evaluated potato starch films with pineapple nanocellulose, from the results, it was assumed that the starch glycerol system exhibits a heterogenous nature and cellulose nanofibers tend to move towards glycerol rich starch phase. Barrier properties also improved with the addition of nanocellulose up to 3 wt% but further addition depreciated properties due to possible fiber agglomeration.…”
Section: Barrier Properties Of Nano-biocompositesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The anti-plasticizing effect has already been reported by other authors when evaluating this plasticizer in different combinations and with other types of starch (Gaudin et al, 2000;Chang et al, 2006;Mali et al, 2008;Liu et al, 2013). Balakrishnan et al (2017) evaluated potato starch films with pineapple nanocellulose, from the results, it was assumed that the starch glycerol system exhibits a heterogenous nature and cellulose nanofibers tend to move towards glycerol rich starch phase. Barrier properties also improved with the addition of nanocellulose up to 3 wt% but further addition depreciated properties due to possible fiber agglomeration.…”
Section: Barrier Properties Of Nano-biocompositesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For example, nanocelluloses could be used in functional coatings, barrier coatings, strength additives, films, emulsions, foams, optical devices, adhesives, composites, biomedical engineering materials, cement, packaging, fillers, nonwoven materials, textiles, and separation membranes. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Two types of nanocellulose [12] can be derived from the cellulose in wood: nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) and nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC). NFC is spaghetti-like in structure, long and flexible, composed of fibers less than 100 nm in width and several micro meter in length, containing both crystalline and amorphous regions.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/gch2201700045mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partial depolymerization of cellulosic materials can lead to the fabrication of nanocellulose. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] There is significant research activity on future applications of this cellulose-derived nanomaterial by the use of an active radical initiator and a nonselective chlorinebased oxidant is a disadvantage in large-scale production.…”
Section: Nanocellulosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biopolymers, such as cellulose, chitin, silk, starch, and bacterial‐derived polysaccharides, have attracted intense attention in recent decades due to their extensive availability, sustainability as well as biocompatibility and biodegradability . In particular, directly utilizing these natural nanobiopolymers as starting materials to create novel structural and functional materials will be an optimal choice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%