Morphometric description of the koala humerus using microcomputed tomography

Abstract

The current prognosis for successful return to function in koalas with appendicular fractures is poor despite being the most common fracture type to result in successful rehabilitation. The forelimb, particularly the humerus, plays a critical role in stabilisation and support while climbing trees. Successful rehabilitation therefore requires adequate internal stabilisation to promote bone healing and faster return to function. Current knowledge of koala limb bone morphometry is lacking and would provide useful clinical insight for future orthopaedic research, particularly with regards to recommendations regarding implant size and type. In this study microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) was used to describe bone length, internal and external diameters, and cortical thickness at five transverse levels along the humerus of skeletally mature koala cadavers. Qualitative descriptions were also made regarding bone features deemed clinically relevant to potential fracture repair techniques. Mean humeral length was 114.3 mm (95% CI 107.29–121.31 mm). Mediolateral diameters were greater than craniocaudal diameters at each measurement level, and the diaphysis has a distally tapering medullary cavity. Diaphyseal cortices were relatively homogenous with slight distal thickening, and medial cortices were thickest along the entire bone. The bone protuberances of the deltoid and supinator ridges projected most of the way down the lateral surface of the bone while the medial surface remained relatively uniform. Distal to the deltoid ridge the humerus curved caudally, terminating at a craniocaudally flattened distal epiphysis. Morphometric descriptions provided in this study will serve as a useful reference for future research, guiding orthopaedic surgery and improving prognosis of koala humeral fractures.

Morphometric description of the feline tibia using three – dimensional computed tomography

“…This required manipulation of the images in the three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction (3D-MPR) to perform angle measurements, which could have skewed some of the measurements if not done correctly. Slice thickness of the CT acquisition was 1.25mm, whereas some previous studies for bone morphometry in animals have used 0.4mm, 0.5mm or micro-CT (2,3,34). Perhaps if the images were collected with thinner slices, measured angles would have been similar to that of plain radiography particularly in determining tibial plateau angle.…”