2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric identification of equid cyathostome (Nematoda: Cyathostominae) infective larvae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
10
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of larvae per gram (LPG) was obtained by multiplying the number of the counted larvae by a factor of ten . The strongyle species/families have been identified based on the third larval stage (L3) morphology , Kornaś et al 2009). Depending on the number of larvae in each sample, between 5-100 larvae per sample were identified and the results were expressed as a percentage.…”
Section: Species-specific Identification Of Equid Strongyles Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of larvae per gram (LPG) was obtained by multiplying the number of the counted larvae by a factor of ten . The strongyle species/families have been identified based on the third larval stage (L3) morphology , Kornaś et al 2009). Depending on the number of larvae in each sample, between 5-100 larvae per sample were identified and the results were expressed as a percentage.…”
Section: Species-specific Identification Of Equid Strongyles Based Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological identification of L3 was made based on the following criteria: type of esophagus, intestinal cells (number, shape, and arrangement), and length of tail (Kornas et al, 2009 S. vulgaris larvae ( Fig. 1) were identified based on the following characteristics: long dimension (900 -1110 µm), short esophagus, long tail, and 28 -32 distinct intestinal cells .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each larval culture, 1 ml of sediment was collected, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 minutes, and analyzed according to the protocol described by Schneider et al (2014), as follows: 100 μl aliquot was used for counting and morphological identification and differentiation of larvae (larvae were immobilized with Lugol's iodine); the remaining sediment (900 μl) was analyzed for identification of S. vulgaris larvae. The strongyle larvae were identified using morphological keys, based on: number, shape, and arrangement of the intestinal cells, type of esophagus, tail length Kornas et al, 2009). …”
Section: Fecal Analyses Larval Culturing and Identification Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers developed morphometric criteria (Kornaś et al 2009) or molecular methods (Hodgkinson et al 2005;Traversa et al 2007) for cyathostome L 3 identification; however, the most practical certainty in identification of small strongyles is from specimens in the large intestine. This is important for determining the prepatent period of the numerous species of small strongyles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%