Morphometric studies of intra‐prostatic volume relationships in localized prostatic cancer

Abstract

Objectives To further characterize patterns of tumour significantly larger in multifocal cases with an index tumour volume of >3 mL than in unifocal tumours growth and the distribution of markers for the aggressiveness of prostate cancer by assessing the relation->3 mL (P<0.05). Small volume, unifocal tumours had little PIN. The most malignant features of each ships among the volume of the 'index' tumour and that of the remaining foci, with pathological (pT) case were always represented in the index tumour but not generally in the remaining foci. stage, histological grade and DNA ploidy, and with the amount of low-and high-grade prostatic intraepiConclusions The volume distribution, related to multicentricity and its concomitant PIN volumes, indicates thelial neoplasia (PIN). Materials and methods Eighty-eight step-sectioned total that large index tumours, uni-or multifocal, of medium or high grade, are associated with low PIN prostatectomy specimens were analysed. The Gleason score, tumour stage and DNA ploidy (by flow cytomvolumes. However, multifocal medium-and highgrade tumours with small index tumour volumes have etry) of multiple samples were determined. Tumour and PIN areas were outlined and their volumes estihigher PIN volumes. Small, single tumours are of lowgrade and may represent the slowly progressing canmated by computerized planimetry. Results The pT stage, Gleason sum and DNA noncers possibly resembling those found in autopsy studies. diploidy increased, and PIN volumes decreased, with increasing volume of the index tumour focus Keywords Prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, morphometry, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) (P<0.01), but did not diÂer significantly between uniand multifocal tumours. However, PIN volumes were most cancerous prostate glands [15]. It has been claimed Introduction that high-grade PIN is a strong risk factor for the occurrence of cancer, whereas low-grade PIN has not There are many prognostic factors related to tumour features in patients with localized prostatic cancer and been shown to be an independent risk [16][17][18][19]. The PIN-volume (low-and high-grade) is inversely correlated the individual validity of these factors is debated. The prognostic value of histological grade is well established with the volume of cancer, i.e. more cancer in a gland gives relatively less PIN. Single-cell image cytometry in prostatic cancer, as in most other malignancies [1][2][3]. The pathological (pT) stage, including seminal vesicle [20,21] has shown that PIN may be largely aneuploid, although less so than the concomitant carcinomas, invasion and positive surgical margins, is a recognized indicator of poor prognosis [4]. Tumours which penetrate contrary to flow cytometric studies showing PIN as mostly diploid [12,15]. Autopsy studies show that lowthe 'capsule' (i.e. the condensed fibrous pseudocapsule) of the prostate have a significantly worse prognosis than grade PIN often precedes cancer by at least 10 years [22,23], but the spatial relationship with invasive cancer '...

Characteristics of prostate cancers detected at low PSA levels

“…Prostate cancer has long been recognized to be a multifocal disease [33] with a so-called index tumor [34] and several satellite tumors. Evaluating the pathological features of sporadic and hereditary prostate cancers, Bastacky et al [35] found that tumor multifocality is a prominent feature which may vary from a mean of 5.2 (hereditary) to 7.3 (sporadic) separate invasive foci per prostate gland.…”

Histological characteristics of the index lesion in whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens: implications for focal therapy

“…When multifocal disease was observed, the index lesion was considered the largest focus as measured by volume, without considering its Gleason score. 15 Secondary foci were defined as all other smaller lesions. Laterality was determined using the urethra as the dividing line in the sagittal plane.…”

“…Furthermore, it has been suggested that in multifocal disease, the largest cancer focus (index lesion) determines disease progression and secondary lesions do not contribute to clinical outcome. [13][14][15] Therefore, targeting the index lesion alone may be sufficient. 1,16,17 Our objective was to examine the pathological features of clinically localized PCa in a UK series to (1) evaluate cancer focality and (2) determine the relationship between the index lesion and histological features of prognosis.…”

Tumor focality in prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy

“…16,54,55 Thus, the index tumor may represent the only lesion in the prostate with truly relevant malignant potential. 56 Contrary to the preceding studies, Ruijter et al 14 found that a quarter of the tumors invading the capsule in multi focal disease were not the index lesion. Tumors need not acquire large volume before they become locally invasive.…”