1996
DOI: 10.1017/s0022149x00015224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometric variability of Schistosoma intercalatum eggs: a diagnostic dilemma

Abstract: Variability of Schistosoma intercalatum eggs in shape and size, and their similarity to those of S. haematobium presented a problem of species identification when egg morphology was the diagnostic criterion used in a study of human schistosomiasis conducted on São Tomé and Principe. More than 2500 egg measurements were obtained by light micoscopy to gather data relating to size variability of S. intercalatum eggs, to evaluate whether factors such as age of host, sex of host and intensity of infection are corre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The length and width of F. hepatica eggs shed by different hosts were different: the eggs were larger in the most usual hosts (cattle and sheep) than in nutria, rats, or rabbits. This has previously been recorded in another trematode: the eggs of Schistosoma intercalatum are larger when shed by the usual human host than by mice (Almeda et al, 1996). Morphological variations of a strigeoid trematode were also host-related (Palmieri, 1977;Perez Ponce de Leon, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The length and width of F. hepatica eggs shed by different hosts were different: the eggs were larger in the most usual hosts (cattle and sheep) than in nutria, rats, or rabbits. This has previously been recorded in another trematode: the eggs of Schistosoma intercalatum are larger when shed by the usual human host than by mice (Almeda et al, 1996). Morphological variations of a strigeoid trematode were also host-related (Palmieri, 1977;Perez Ponce de Leon, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Indeed, if the evidence of S. haematobium is widely reported in Lambaréné, 12,27 only scarce data reveal the presence of S. intercalatum 10 or S. guineensis 16 in the area. Because S. haematobium eggs can be found in stool, 28 and confusion between S. intercalatum and S. haematobium eggs is possible when the differentiation is carried out based only on their shape and size using a microscopic method, 29 as we did, it will be relevant to use a molecular method to reconfirm the presence of S. intercalatum and/or S. guineensis in the area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Besides, egg size and shape (length/width ratio) were highly variable; about 70% of this variation was present within a single patient. Intraspecific variability is known to impede species identification (Almeda et al 1996) and therefore complicates the differentiation between pure and hybrid species. Finally, it should be noted that none of the studies mentioned above used molecular methods to verify species status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different schistosome species or strains have typically different mean egg sizes or different maxima when plotting density curves (Pitchford, 1965; Almeda et al 1996). The unimodal distribution of egg-measurements in this study and the absence of morphological differences between HH eggs and HB eggs suggest that both genetic classes of eggs belong to one random mating schistosome population, without mating restrictions in the next generation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%