MAZE, J. 1988. Sources of morphological variation and organization within and among populations of Balsamorhiza sagittata. Can. J . Bot. 66: 11 -17. Comparisons of differences between morphological means of individual plant parts indicate that the greatest source of variation in two populations of Balsamorhiza sagittata is the individual plants within populations; within-population diversity is greater than among-population diversity. Variable covariance and correlations differ between individual plants and there are subgroups of interrelated variables that can be tied to developmental phenomena. The relationship between developmental phenomena and these groups of variables suggests a relationship between organizational, as reflected in variable interrelationships, and ontogenetic variation. These results are not adequately explained by neoDaminian theory but are explained more comprehensively by a theory of evolution that views biological change over time as an intrinsically driven self-organization, accompanied by an increase in complexity (a manifestation of the "Second Law of Thermodynamics" as it applies to open systems).ROBSON, K. A., SCAGEL, R. K., et MAZE, J. 1988. Sources of morphological variation and organization within and among populations of Balsamorhiza sagittata. Can. J . Bot. 66 : 11 -17. La comparaison des diffkrences entre les moyennes morphologiques des parties individuelles de plantes indique que les plants individuels 1'intCrieur des populations constituent la source de variation la plus importante dans les deux populations du Balsamorhiza sagittata; la diversitk intra-population est plus grande que la diversit6 inter-population. La covariance des variables et les corrClations different entre les plants individuels et il existe des sous-groupes de variables en corklation qui peuvent &tre liCs aux phCnomknes du dCveloppement. Les relations entre les phCnomknes du dCveloppement et ces groupes de variables indiquent des relations entre la variation organisationnelle, comme le dCmontre la relation kciproque entre les variables, et la variation ontoginique. Le nCo-Daminisme n'explique pas adCquatement ces rCsultats qui s'expliquent de f a~o n plus complkte par une thCorie de I'Cvolution qui considkre les changements biologiques temporels comme une auto-organisation mue intrinskquement, accompagnke d'une plus grand complexit6 (une manifestation de la ~Deuxikme Loi de la Thermodynamique,, telle qu'elle s'applique aux systkmes ouverts).[Traduit par la revue]