Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists 2004
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012778460-1/50016-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometrics and systematics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
575
0
20

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 331 publications
(595 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
575
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…The light gray boxes are 95% quantiles of mean pair-wise distance based on 1,000 bootstraps. Asterisks represent significant shifts in disparity, based on resampling tests with 1,000 bootstraps (P < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected) (46). The dark gray vertical lines represent the following extinction events: the first Hirnantian extinction pulse at the onset of glaciation, the second Hirnantian extinction pulse as the glacial interval ended, and the extinction event at the end of the AZE in the Early Silurian.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The light gray boxes are 95% quantiles of mean pair-wise distance based on 1,000 bootstraps. Asterisks represent significant shifts in disparity, based on resampling tests with 1,000 bootstraps (P < 0.05, Bonferroni-corrected) (46). The dark gray vertical lines represent the following extinction events: the first Hirnantian extinction pulse at the onset of glaciation, the second Hirnantian extinction pulse as the glacial interval ended, and the extinction event at the end of the AZE in the Early Silurian.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure of all mtDNA haplotype lineages within P. blainvillii to coalesce between T1 and the present results in an opportunity for deep coalescence between P. blainvillii and P. cerroense. specimen using CoordGen (20). We used PCA to determine whether any morphological groupings were detectable without the a priori designation of groups, and we tested for significant differences in cranial horn shapes between parapatric phylogeographic groups using a 1-way MANOVA in JMP 7.0 (SAS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear measurements of cranial horns were included in this study; however, standard linear measurements are limited to detecting changes in relative length and do not capture the extent to which complex shapes, such as curved cranial horns, vary among popu-lations. Geometric morphometric techniques provide a viable alternative for analyzing complex shapes in multivariate space by retaining information about the relative spatial arrangements of the data throughout the analysis, which allows for the visualization of shape differences among groups (20). In this study, we conduct a geometric morphometric analysis of cranial horn shapes to determine whether the morphological evolution of these characters accompanies the formation of lineages in the P. coronatum species complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological variation in the molars was quantitatively analyzed using a geometric morphometric 338 model where shape was defined by placing a series of homologous landmarks at discrete anatomical 339 loci on the individual teeth (Zelditch et al 2004). The resulting Cartesian coordinate data were, after 340 the appropriate transformations, compared with PAST 2.17b.…”
Section: Geometric Morphometrics 311mentioning
confidence: 99%