“…The more recent fluorescence of landmark-based applications has been driven by advances in anthropology (Bookstein et al, 2004;Elewa, 2010;Richtsmeier et al, 1992;Slice, 2007) and a wide range of other research domains (Adams et al, 2004Bookstein, 1982Bookstein, , 1991Bookstein, , 2016Jensen, 2003;MacLeod, 2017;Marcus et al, 1996;Rohlf, 1990Rohlf, , 1999Rohlf & Marcus, 1993;Rohlf & Slice, 1990;Zelditch et al, 2004) that articulate with the rise of the Procrustes paradigm (Adams et al, 2013, 8). Archaeological applications have included two-dimensional (2D) analyses of Clovis technology in North America (Buchanan & Collard, 2010;Buchanan et al, 2011Buchanan et al, , 2013Buchanan et al, , 2015Eren et al, 2015), Fishtail or Fell projectile points in South America (Castiñeira et al, 2011;Loponte et al, 2015), bifacial points from the Umbu Tradition in Brazil (Okumura & Araujo, 2013, 2014, lanceolate points-ayampitin-from Argentina (Rivero & Heider, 2017), the size and shape of projectile points from southern Patagonia (Charlin & González-José, 2012;Charlin et al, 2014), bifacial tools from southern Poland (Serwatka, 2015), Final Palaeolithic large tanged points (Serwatka & Riede, 2016), Paleoindian point types from Florida (Thulman, 2012) and the Southern High Plains (Buchanan et al, 2007(Buchanan et al, , 2017, ceramics from Casas Grandes…”