2022
DOI: 10.16965/ijar.2021.205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphometry and Sexual Dimorphism of the Human Clavicle in South Indian Population

Abstract: Background: In forensic anthropology, determining an individual's sex is the fundamental criteria of identification, but this is a tough task that gets considerably more difficult when only a single bone, such as the clavicle, is available. In physical anthropology, determining the sex of a deceased individual is a fundamental prerequisite. Physical anthropologists have gotten more concerned about the difficulties of human identity in recent years. Traditional techniques of sexing bone are subjective and ineff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Situations such as asymmetric vascularization, lateralized behavior, activity-related changes, or greater mechanical loading of the clavicle on the dominant hand side may be possible explanations for clavicle asymmetry [23]. In studies conducted according to gender, it has been reported that characteristics of the clavicle such as length, thickness and weight are larger in men [2,3,17,19,29]. Since there was no gender record of the bones used in our study, a comparison with the literature could not be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Situations such as asymmetric vascularization, lateralized behavior, activity-related changes, or greater mechanical loading of the clavicle on the dominant hand side may be possible explanations for clavicle asymmetry [23]. In studies conducted according to gender, it has been reported that characteristics of the clavicle such as length, thickness and weight are larger in men [2,3,17,19,29]. Since there was no gender record of the bones used in our study, a comparison with the literature could not be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%