2016
DOI: 10.1017/scs.2017.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphosource: Archiving and Sharing 3-D Digital Specimen Data

Abstract: Advancement of understanding in paleontology and biology has always been hindered by difficulty in accessing comparative data. With current and burgeoning technology, the severity of this hindrance can be substantially reduced. Researchers and museum personnel generating three-dimensional (3-D) digital models of museum specimens can archive them using internet repositories that can then be explored and utilized by other researchers and private individuals without a museum trip. We focus on MorphoSource, the la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
134
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treeshrew mandibles ( n = 43; all specimens are listed in Table ) from a mixed sample of males and females were micro‐CT scanned in a Nikon XT H 225 ST High Resolution X‐ray CT Scanner at the Shared Materials Instrumentation Facility at Duke University or were downloaded from MorphoSource (Boyer et al, ) and range in voxel dimensions from 11 to 29 μm. The sample consists of 15 species from both treeshrew families, representing three of four currently recognized genera, excluding only Anathana .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treeshrew mandibles ( n = 43; all specimens are listed in Table ) from a mixed sample of males and females were micro‐CT scanned in a Nikon XT H 225 ST High Resolution X‐ray CT Scanner at the Shared Materials Instrumentation Facility at Duke University or were downloaded from MorphoSource (Boyer et al, ) and range in voxel dimensions from 11 to 29 μm. The sample consists of 15 species from both treeshrew families, representing three of four currently recognized genera, excluding only Anathana .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landmark-based approaches have two major shortcomings. First, many modern datasets are not defined by landmarks; instead, they consist of 3D CT scans [8,9]. Second, reducing these detailed mesh data to simple landmarks often results in a great deal of information loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a dataset of fruit fly wings, some mutants may have extra lobes of veins [15]; or, in a dataset of brain arteries, many of the arteries cannot be continuously mapped to each other [16]. Indeed, in large databases such as the MorphoSource [9], the CT scans of skulls across many clades are not diffeomorphic. Thus, there is a real need for 3D image analysis methods that do not require correspondences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several resources nationwide in the process of sharing 3-D raw data, including those of paleontological relevance. These initiatives have great potential to allow students to develop deeper understanding of morphological changes demonstrated in specimens (Boyer et al, 2017). This is an enormous shift in how science can be taught.…”
Section: Implementing 3-d Scanning Printing and Paleontology In K-12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, specimens in the past were analyzed in large part through standard, 2-D photographs (Lauridsen et al, 2016). Thanks to 3-D data available today, not only do scientists have the opportunity to produce high fidelity descriptions, but K-12 students can also learn complex concepts, e.g., evolution and extinction, by visually analyzing changes that occur over time (Boyer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implementing 3-d Scanning Printing and Paleontology In K-12mentioning
confidence: 99%