2005
DOI: 10.1007/11558484_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morse Connections Graph for Shape Representation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular is the Reeb graph which is used for shape modeling and analysis and surface reconstruction (see for example [25][26][27]). Differences between the Reeb graph and the MCG can be found in [13]. The main one is that unlike the MCG, the graph connection between two critical points in the Reeb graph does not necessarily correspond to the existence of a flow trajectory between them.…”
Section: Dynamics Of a Multidimensional Scalar Field And Associated Mmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most popular is the Reeb graph which is used for shape modeling and analysis and surface reconstruction (see for example [25][26][27]). Differences between the Reeb graph and the MCG can be found in [13]. The main one is that unlike the MCG, the graph connection between two critical points in the Reeb graph does not necessarily correspond to the existence of a flow trajectory between them.…”
Section: Dynamics Of a Multidimensional Scalar Field And Associated Mmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Section 4, we derive conclusions related to the concept of the Morse Connections Graph (MCG) introduced in [13]. This is a graph whose nodes are critical components and whose edges display the existence of trajectories connecting them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%