Mortality after emergent trauma laparotomy

Abstract

Background Two decades ago, hypotensive trauma patients requiring emergent laparotomy had a 40% mortality. In the interim, multiple interventions to decrease hemorrhage-related mortality have been implemented but few have any documented evidence of change in outcomes for patients requiring emergent laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to determine current mortality rates for patients undergoing emergent trauma laparotomy. Methods A retrospective cohort of all adult, emergent trauma laparotomies performed in 2012–2013 at 12 Level I trauma centers was reviewed. Emergent trauma laparotomy was defined as emergency department (ED) admission to surgical start time in ≤90 minutes. Hypotension was defined as arrival ED systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mmHg. Cause and time to death was also determined. Continuous data are presented as median [IQR]. Results 1,706 patients underwent emergent trauma laparotomy. The cohort was predominately young (31 years [24, 45]), male (84%), sustained blunt trauma (67%), and with moderate injuries (ISS 19 [10, 33]). The time in ED was 24 minutes [14, 39] and time from ED admission to surgical start was 42 minutes [30, 61]. The most common procedures were enterectomy (23%), hepatorrhaphy (20%), enterorrhaphy (16%), and splenectomy (16%). Damage control laparotomy was utilized in 38% of all patients and 62% of hypotensive patients. The Injury Severity Score for the entire cohort was 19 (IQR 10, 33) and 29 (IQR 18, 41) for the hypotensive group. Mortality for the entire cohort was 21% with 60% of deaths due to hemorrhage. Mortality in the hypotensive group was 46%, with 65% of deaths due to hemorrhage. Conclusion Overall mortality rate of a trauma laparotomy is substantial (21%) with hemorrhage accounting for 60% of the deaths. The mortality rate for hypotensive patients (46%) appears unchanged over the last two decades and is even more concerning, with almost half of patients presenting with a SBP ≤ 90 mmHg dying. Level of Evidence Level III (retrospective epidemiologcal study with up to two negative criteria)

How do I get an emergency civilian walking blood bank running?

“…The risk of seroconversion in our national regular donor pool in the previous 3 years is 1:100,000 for hepatitis B and hepatitis C in total and none for HIV. Based on the patient risk of exsanguination compared to the risk of transfusion transmitted infections, we found this justifiable . The virus testing was performed later the same day, and all tests results were negative.…”

“…Based on the patient risk of exsanguination compared to the risk of transfusion transmitted infections, we found this justifiable. 16 The virus testing was performed later the same day, and all tests results were negative. Based on our experiences, appropriately selected rapid virus testing could be considered as a resilience measure in scenarios like this.…”

What's new for trauma haemorrhage management?

“…Haemorrhage remains the dominant cause of preventable death from injury, and massive haemorrhage carries a mortality of around 50% (Stanworth et al, 2016, Bardes et al, 2018. Outcomes in patients requiring damage control surgery for intra-abdominal haemorrhage have not improved significantly in the last decade (Harvin et al, 2017. The moniker of haemostatic resuscitation may also be unfounded, as markers of shock and coagulopathy do not improve during active haemorrhage even if the core principles are adhered to (Khan et al, 2015).…”

Effect of earlier door-to-CT and door-to-bleeding control in severe blunt trauma: a retrospective cohort study

“…1 Uncontrolled hemorrhage is the leading cause of potentially preventable death. [2][3][4] Approximately 20-40% of trauma deaths occurring after hospital arrival involve massive hemorrhage from truncal injury and are potentially preventable with early bleeding control procedures and improved resuscitation techniques. 5 Su cient therapy within the rst hour after injury signi cantly increases outcome in these patients.…”