2015
DOI: 10.1177/0885066615623202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality and Resource Utilization After Critical Care Transport of Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Abstract: In this cohort with hypoxemic respiratory failure transported to tertiary care facilities, patients had a mortality rate comparable to patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with best practices and a mortality rate lower than predicted based on APACHE-II score. The risks of CCT are outweighed by the benefits of transfer to a tertiary care facility, and pretransport hypoxemia should not be used as an absolute contraindication to transport.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“… 15 16 These were not cases of ARDS, at least at the time of transport. Compared with other studies of tertiary interhospital transports of severely hypoxaemic patients, the mortality rate is lower in our cohort, 17–19 while being higher than long-term mortality rates in secondary interhospital transferred trauma patients at 3,6 and 12 months. 20–22 Of course, expected mortality will be based on a number of different patient factors, including age, comorbidity, extent of injury or illness and more.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“… 15 16 These were not cases of ARDS, at least at the time of transport. Compared with other studies of tertiary interhospital transports of severely hypoxaemic patients, the mortality rate is lower in our cohort, 17–19 while being higher than long-term mortality rates in secondary interhospital transferred trauma patients at 3,6 and 12 months. 20–22 Of course, expected mortality will be based on a number of different patient factors, including age, comorbidity, extent of injury or illness and more.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…26 Studies have shown that transferring patients with ARDS to tertiary care centers, especially those with ECMO capabilities, improved survival over patients remaining in referring hospitals. 1,2,27,28 Although initiating ECMO prior to transport is possible and in some series, improved the safety of traveling, [29][30][31] ECMO cannulation is not universally available. Therefore, the onus is on centers with ECMO capabilities to provide safe passage for accepting patients into their centers, by air or ground.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Patients with respiratory failure transported by a highly trained CCT team have improved outcomes as compared to their predicted mortality by severity of illness scores. 10 A cohort of hypoxemic respiratory failure patients with a predicted mortality of approximately 64% by APACHE II score had a mortality rate of 35% 10 after transport to tertiary care ECMO centers. Transport by a skilled CCT team is the best way to mitigate the increased risk of transporting hypoxemic respiratory failure patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Therefore, in most instances, the benefits of tertiary care for patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure outweigh the risks of transport with a dedicated CCT team, when considered in the context of remaining at a community hospital with limited resources. 9,10 In these four cases, no patient was cannulated for ECMO at the receiving hospital. Two patients died within 24 hours of arrival, but the other two survived to hospital discharge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation