DOI: 10.15368/theses.2012.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mortality Assessment of Redwood and Mixed Conifer Forest Types in Santa Cruz County Following Wildfire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Field survey crews were trained in proper procedures, and mortality was assessed three separate times over three years [17]. However, it is possible that there are errors in the field data used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Field survey crews were trained in proper procedures, and mortality was assessed three separate times over three years [17]. However, it is possible that there are errors in the field data used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree status was assessed each year following the fire, through 2012, with the most recent status (2012) being used for this analysis. The diameters of trees in plots measured in 2003 was projected to 2008 using a growth rate of 2% [17]. The plot mortality used is the percent mortality in trees at least 25.4 cm (10′′) DBH, to avoid the confounding effect of the presence or absence, before the fire, of a large number of small trees in a plot; the 47 plots used are the subset of a total of 83 plots in the study area which have at least 15 trees which are at least 25.4 cm DBH.…”
Section: Tree Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, initial assessment was 87.9% accurate, including smaller diameter classes which had lower accuracy (Auten, 2012). It can reasonably be assumed that a few trees which were removed during salvage operations may have actually survived the fire, meaning that the percent mortality for a few plots may be slightly inaccurate.…”
Section: Errors In Mortality Datamentioning
confidence: 95%