Mortality by mode of delivery among infants with spina bifida in Texas

Abstract

Background: It is hypothesized that cesarean delivery may reduce mortality among infants with spina bifida (e.g., by reducing trauma to the open lesion); however, few studies have assessed this relationship. Methods: We used the Texas Birth Defects Registry to identify neonates with spina bifida born between 1999 and 2014. The mode of delivery (main exposure) was abstracted from each subject's birth certificate. The vital status (main outcome) was determined based on the presence or absence of a death certificate. When a death certificate was present, survival time was calculated by subtracting the date of birth from the date of death. We then conducted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio between cesarean delivery and death prior to 29 days. We adjusted for maternal race/ethnicity, maternal education, gestational age/birthweight, and breech presentation. This analysis was repeated for death prior to 365 days. Results: We analyzed 1,983 nonsyndromic, liveborn neonates with spina bifida, and 68% of these neonates were delivered by cesarean. After adjusting for potential confounders, the adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] for death prior to 29 days was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49, 1.21) and the aHR for death prior to 365 days was 0.93 (95% CI 0.63, 1.38) comparing infants delivered by cesarean to those delivered vaginally. Conclusions: Despite a lack of strong prior epidemiologic evidence, cesarean rates for neonates with spina bifida were high. Further investigations of the relationship between mode of delivery and infant outcomes, including mortality, complications, and long-term prognosis, are warranted. K E Y W O R D S cesarean section, infant mortality, neural tube defects, proportional hazards models, spina bifida

Neonatal and infant mortality associated with spina bifida: A systematic review and meta-analysis

“…For multiple papers which overlapped in time, study region and objectives [3,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], only the study (or a combination of studies) with the best quality, largest population size, and covering the longest and most recent periods were included.…”

Could Subtle Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy Be Related to Unilateral B Glenoid Osteoarthritis?

“…The literature search yielded 449 articles after duplicates removal ( Figure 2 ). More than 75% of these articles were excluded following title or full-text screening ( n = 259 and n = 81, respectively), leaving a total of 109 studies for further analyses ( Table S1 ) [ 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ,…”

Association between maternal smoking and survival among infants with trisomy 21

“…Time-dependent interactions were used to assess whether the proportional hazards assumption was met. To allow for comparison across models, confounders were selected a priori based on maternal factors associated with smoking and infant mortality from the prior literature (age, race/ethnicity, education level, residency along the Texas-Mexico border) (Benjamin et al, 2019). Preterm birth and low birth weight were not included in the multivariable models due to their potential to be intermediate variables on the causal pathway (Wilcox, Weinberg, & Basso, 2011).…”

“…Infants with a death in the neonatal period (0-27 days) were not included in post-neonatal death group (28-364 days). Based on our prior work (Benjamin et al, 2019), those without a date of death within the interval assessed were presumed to be alive. Death certificates for these cases were also used to determine the underlying cause of death (ICD-10 code).…”