Mortality from different causes associated with meat, heme iron, nitrates, and nitrites in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study: population based cohort study

Abstract

Objective To determine the association of different types of meat intake and meat associated compounds with overall and cause specific mortality. Design Population based cohort study. Setting Baseline dietary data of the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study (prospective cohort of the general population from six states and two metropolitan areas in the US) and 16 year follow-up data until 31 December 2011. Participants 536 969 AARP members aged 50-71 at baseline. Exposures Intake of total meat, processed and unprocessed red meat (beef, lamb, and pork) and white meat (poultry and fish), heme iron, and nitrate/nitrite from processed meat based on dietary questionnaire. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used with the lowest fifth of calorie adjusted intakes as reference categories. Main outcome measure Mortality from any cause during follow-up. Results An increased risk of all cause mortality (hazard ratio for highest versus lowest fifth 1.26, 95% confidence interval 1.23 to 1.29) and death due to nine different causes associated with red meat intake was observed. Both processed and unprocessed red meat intakes were associated with all cause and cause specific mortality. Heme iron and processed meat nitrate/nitrite were independently associated with increased risk of all cause and cause specific mortality. Mediation models estimated that the increased mortality associated with processed red meat was influenced by nitrate intake (37.0-72.0%) and to a lesser degree by heme iron (20.9-24.1%). When the total meat intake was constant, the highest fifth of white meat intake was associated with a 25% reduction in risk of all cause mortality compared with the lowest intake level. Almost all causes of death showed an inverse association with white meat intake. Conclusions The results show increased risks of all cause mortality and death due to nine different causes associated with both processed and unprocessed red meat, accounted for, in part, by heme iron and nitrate/nitrite from processed meat. They also show reduced risks associated with substituting white meat, particularly unprocessed white meat.

Association of dietary macronutrient composition and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an ageing population: the Rotterdam Study

“…In this study however, BMI was not taken into account as a covariate, and macronutrients were not adjusted for dietary quality (eg, DHDI). Interestingly, a large epidemiological study showed that high red meat intake was associated with all-cause mortality and in particular with mortality from liver diseases (HR 2.30, highest vs lowest quintile) 36. In addition, a study from Israel found that high meat consumption, specifically high red and processed meat consumption were associated with NAFLD and insulin resistance, independent of saturated fat intake and BMI 37.…”

Meat consumption, health, and the environment

“…In high-income Western countries, large prospective studies and meta-analyses generally show that total mortality rates are modestly higher in participants who have high intakes of both red and processed meat than in those with low meat intakes, whereas no or moderate inverse associations have been observed for poultry (27)(28)(29)(30). However, part of this may be due to the association of high meat intakes with other major risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and obesity because the information needed to remove statistically the influence of these confounding factors may not be available.…”

The Moral Justification Behind a Climate Tax on Beef in Denmark

“…Although it goes beyond the scope of this paper, it is worth mentioning that a substantial number of studies confirm that shifting diets towards less meat (particularly from ruminants) and dairy intake would not only reduce GHG emissions but simultaneously result in water and land use reductions as well as having modest benefits for all-cause mortality risk (Aleksandrowicz et al 2016;Etemadi et al 2017). …”