To the Editor We read with great interest the article by Patrova et al 1 on the risk of mortality in patients with nonfunctional adrenal tumors. This study addresses a topic of pivotal importance in adrenal disease that has been the subject of intense research interest in recent years.Whether patients with adrenal adenoma in the absence of overt hormone hypersecretion have an increased risk of death has been debated for a long time. It is only recently that more robust evidence has become available in this regard. 2-4 A central role is played in this context by mild autonomous cortisol secretion (MACS), defined as a postdexamethasone suppression test (DST) serum cortisol level greater than 50 nmol/L. 5 In fact, patients with MACS have been shown to have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality compared with patients with true nonfunctioning adrenal adenomas (NFAA), 2-4 defined as having a post-DST serum cortisol level of 50 nmol/L or less. 5 However, in the article by Patrova et al, 1 the use of NFAA can be misleading. In this population-based retrospective cohort study, the exclusion criteria for hormonal activity were based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) classification codes, according to which patients with Cushing syndrome (ICD-10 code, E24.0), congenital adrenal hyperplasia (E25.0), primary aldosteronism (E26.0), and pheochromocytoma (E27.5) were excluded from the analyses. These criteria are reassuring in terms of excluding patients with adrenal masses associated with overt hormonal excess. However, they do not seem sufficient to exclude patients with MACS, who do not fall into any of the ICD-10 classifications listed.Consequently, the cohort of patients analyzed by Patrova et al 1 likely encompassed both patients with MACS and those with true NFAA. This should be considered when interpreting the results, given that MACS has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, 5 and the inclusion of these patients in the study cohort has likely affected outcomes with an upward inflation of the effect size. Notably, DST data are lacking because the authors do not report whether and in how many patients a DST was performed; therefore, a distinction between patients with MACS and with true NFAA is not possible. Thus, the available data are insufficient to conclude whether being affected by a true NFAA is associated with an increased risk of mortality, and this point has yet to be fully established.